User talk:Armoracia-1
Armoracia-1, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Armoracia-1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 19:30, 26 August 2019 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for September 6
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of discoveries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rutherford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:13, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 13
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of discoveries, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sapiens and Vanity Fair (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:28, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 23
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of discoveries, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Saint Mary's University and Palpa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:26, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi Dialectric,
hope everything is fine with yourself at this time, I don't want to bother you too much, because I'm sure you're busy, like so many other genuinely committed editors, as I presume you to be.
"@Dialectric I don't see where in Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists it shown "that inline citations are sufficient for list articles", you could provide the short-cut as to the actual part of the page indicates this. Armoracia-1 (talk) 15:25, 22 September 2019 (UTC)"
is a copy of an entry I made to our debate/diagreement/argument @ https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:History_of_discoveries#Scope_of_the_article
https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_discoveries&action=history
you see I linked Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists, and "that inline citations are sufficient for list articles" is a quotation of something written by yourself (Dialectric)
I don't see either the link to the wikipedia page or the statement you made of inline citations are sufficient for list articles in the Talk page discussion.
01:31, 22 September 2019 is the edit made by Onetwothreeip "Scope of the article: new section"
14:36, 22 September 2019 is your first entry to the discussion → https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_discoveries&oldid=917158250#reversion_of_01:33,_22_September_2019
15:25, 22 September 2019 https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_discoveries&oldid=917165989#reversion_of_01:33,_22_September_2019 shows my linking of the wikipedia page Stand alone lista and the quotation, but doesn't show you having added anything to quote or a link to Stand-alone lists. The reason I wanted to mention this to you Dialectric is because I didn't know Stand-alone lists existed until you included the link within the discussion (apart from the fact my message shows a quotation, and now there is no indication I am able to see of you having added anything to quote)
Armoracia-1 (talk) 10:08, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 30
[edit]An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- List of discoveries by disciplines (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Brill, Springer, Queen Caroline, Femoral, Timothy White, Charles I and Science Museum
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 7
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of discoveries by disciplines, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Abstract and Ariège (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Ways to improve List of discoveries by disciplines
[edit]Hello, Armoracia-1,
Thank you for creating List of discoveries by disciplines.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
The scope of this article is overly-broad, and needs to be narrowed beyond the variety of dictionary definitions that are provided to support its existence. Consider a clearer definition of this area, based in scientifically credible literature, and use that to limit the article's scope and prevent it becoming a bloated list.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|FULBERT}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
FULBERT (talk) 18:35, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of List of discoveries by disciplines for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of discoveries by disciplines is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of discoveries by disciplines until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:45, 16 January 2020 (UTC)