Jump to content

User talk:Armanddequais

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Merle Marsicano has been accepted

[edit]
Merle Marsicano, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MapleSoy (talk) 17:48, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Armanddequais, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Br19881987 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 08:08, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Jalen, No, I don't know Br19881987 nor am I coordinating edits with them. I saw Max Schneider's TikTok video about the misidentification of his father, and made an edit, substantiated with a citation, based on that fact. Armanddequais (talk) 00:49, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I see you reverted based on "unreliable source." Is the Jewish Telegraph considered unreliable? Can a TikTok video posted by the subject of the article be used as a source? Armanddequais (talk) 00:53, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]