User talk:Arlene Kunde
January 2025
[edit]Hello, I'm Golikom. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to John Breen (scholar) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Golikom (talk) 11:58, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Jacob Tuioti-Mariner, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Golikom (talk) 12:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC) |
Unblock request
[edit]Arlene Kunde (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Where is the evidence of "sockpuppetry"?!? This is the first account I've ever used!!! I'm absolutely FUMING about this Arlene Kunde (talk) 12:10, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Decline reason:
OK Hamish. Spicy (talk) 16:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.