User talk:AritaMoonlight81

Welcome!

Hello, AritaMoonlight81, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Rklawton (talk) 14:10, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When making claims in articles, you need to properly source them. Our page on reliable sources can help you out. Rklawton (talk) 14:10, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced material to our articles as you are doing with the article on South Korea. If you persist, you will be blocked from editing. Rklawton (talk) 14:14, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Your recent editing history at 2020 Summer Olympics shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. GrayFullbuster (talk) 00:41, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at 2020 Summer Olympics. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:41, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Your recent editing history to the 2020 Summer Olympics page shows that you have been engaged in an edit war. This can result in being blocked as it has been done before in your case. Please refrain from this kind of behavior on Wikipedia to ensure that further blocking does not take place.--MusicGeek101 (talk) 15:08, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Your recent editing history to 2020 Summer Olympics and Tokyo bid for the 2020 Summer Olympics pages shows that you have been engaged in an edit war. This can result in being blocked as it has been done before in your case. Please refrain from this kind of behavior on Wikipedia to ensure that further blocking does not take place. --MusicGeek101 (talk) 04:11, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

- FUKUSHIMA|journal=Nature|volume=485|issue=7399|pages=423–424|doi=10.1038/485423a}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|journal=Journal of Radiol. Prot. |volume=26|author=Cardis et al.| doi:10.1088/0952-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:49, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Radiation effects from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:18, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Radiation effects from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

due to the accident, as in the Chernobyl accident, may not be statistically detectable. <ref>{{Cite journal|journal=Journal of Radiol. Prot. |volume=26|author=Cardis et al.| doi:10.1088/0952-
news/2011/fukushimafull.html|title=Japan Earthquake Update|date=19 March 2011|work=[[IAEA]]}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:25, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fukushima edits

Hello, AritaMoonlight81. You have new messages at Talk:Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster#Help:_I_cannot_do_this_alone.
Message added 09:20, 26 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Gautier lebon (talk) 09:20, 26 November 2013 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, AritaMoonlight81. You have new messages at Talk:Radiation_effects_from_the_Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster#Conflicting_edits_-_help_needed.
Message added 09:20, 26 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Gautier lebon (talk) 09:20, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Radiation effects from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

as in the Chernobyl accident, may not be statistically detectable. {{sfn|WHO|2013|p=8}} <ref>{{Cite journal|journal=Journal of Radiol. Prot. |volume=26|author=Cardis et al.| doi:10.1088/0952-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:32, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GDPs

I notice you are changing GDP figures at articles like Mexico. Be aware that currency swings are causing a lot of the volatility in reported GDPs (the Peso, Dollar and Euro are all experiencing wide swings relative to each other). It's probably not worth continually re-editing to match precise numbers as they will be re-adjusted as often as you can edit them. My personal guess is that this year any swing of 30% or less is going to be lost in the noise of currency fluctuations. Regards, Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 03:54, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evacuation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, AritaMoonlight81. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]