User talk:Aristofane di bisanzio

Welcome

Hello, Aristofane di bisanzio, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dave ^{♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™} 08:12, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarizing?

For your sake, I hope you did not mean to do it on purpose because two of your recent edits, on the article pages of F-8 Crusader and Hawker Siddeley Nimrod appears to be verbatim copy from an unknown book, which I remember reading it somewhere but can't seem to recall which book it was. But for verification purposes, I hope you can provide the necessary reference or I'm afraid that it cannot be accepted into Wikipedia in part or in full, per WP:COPYVIO. Regards. --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™} 08:19, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Are you using the IP address 193.205.142.115 (talk • contribs • info • WHOIS) to re-introduce the text into the article page of Hawker Siddeley Nimrod again? --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™} 10:46, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please log in before editing

It appears that you are editing the Hawker Siddeley Nimrod article while logged out. Please ensure that you are logged in before editing in the future. Nick-D (talk) 10:47, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cy Twombly

Welcome and thanks for your ideas. References are much preferred in English as this is an English-language resource. We don't link countries' names. And we don't say things like "fitly" which are judgments. Let me know if you need any help. --John (talk) 15:46, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Felix somary

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Felix somary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Inks.LWC (talk) 09:05, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:44, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Felix somary

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Felix somary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. --Djc wi (talk) 10:47, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Felix somary

The article Felix somary has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No context identifying subject of article. Possible notability issues.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Djc wi (talk) 10:59, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Felix Somary. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. It seems that you rarely use edit summaries - it would assist greatly if you could develop the habit. Thanks. Sitush (talk) 11:37, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Game of Kings: proposed deletion

Proposed deletion of Game of Kings

The article Game of Kings has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yunshui (talk) 13:08, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roman Umistowski

The article Roman Umistowski has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mbch331 (talk) 10:47, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roman Umistowski for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roman Umistowski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman Umistowski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mbch331 (talk) 11:02, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Victor Erofeyev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Molotov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Vyacheslav Molotov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lubyanka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. When you recently edited Quirico Filopanti, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Charles IX and MP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:50, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

Hi. When you recently edited Jakob Böhme, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mercury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Book sources - page numbers needed

Hi. When you add new information to the encyclopedia, I notice that you usually say what book you saw the information in, but please also note what page the information is from. See WP:CITE for more information. Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:57, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Violet Vanbrugh

Hi there and thanks for your addition on the above, however, I note that there is no source with the information you provided. Can you please pop back and add the reference from where the information comes from. Please see WP:REF and WP:RS as a guide. Thanks! -- Cassianto^Talk 09:05, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Aristofane, I had already moved your information further up in the article to a more appropriate section and added an appropriate reference. Your long quote by Acton is more about Acton than it is about Vanbrugh, and so it is is inconsistent with WP:BALANCE. I have therefore streamlined it to include only the most interesting information about Vanbrugh. When you add new information to Wikipedia, please always WP:CITE your source, including the page number. -- Ssilvers (talk) 14:25, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Guy Burgess, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I've removed it for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 08:17, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]