User talk:Arindami34

Welcome!

Hello, Arindami34, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Rahat Fateh Ali Khan does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Managerarc™^talk 19:33, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Caste , Caste , Brahmin, Houri, and Sayyid. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. -- Toddy1 (talk) 07:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sayyid. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:34, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Caste . Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:34, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Islam, you may be blocked from editing. -- Toddy1 (talk) 07:36, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pakistan. -- Toddy1 (talk) 07:38, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Everytime I put the word Syed in Muslim articles you remove them and allege vandalism what are you trying to hide they are an important caste of descendants of Prophet Muhammad are you Christian or a secret Muslim who wants to hide that Syeds exist in this world please reply. Arindami34 (talk) 07:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been putting this stuff in front of citations that were already there. This makes it look as though the citations support your addition. That is not good. You claim to be able to provide citations for the stuff. But you have not provided any citations.

If you want to persist, then you should use the article talk pages. You need to provide citations, and you need to show that what you want to add is relevant. It is of course true that "Syed" means descendant of the prophet; that fact does not justify your edits.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:53, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Brahmin article needs to have it as a comparison of the castes I will put it in See also,hope you stop seeing my user contributions and revert less of them and call less of them as vandalism.Arindami34 (talk) 07:58, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add irrelevant Islam-related wikilinks to articles on Hindu subjects like you did to the article on Brahmin.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:04, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 10:30, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Once this block expires please make sure you add sources along with your additions. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 10:34, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SPI notice

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arindami34. Thank you. LM2000 (talk) 07:46, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arindami34. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:45, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]