User talk:Arindam Vats
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Arindam Vats! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Ekdalian (talk) 07:30, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hi! Ekdalian , thanks for the welcome message. Your edit was the last on the article of Madan Mohan Malviya you added that either he was Kayastha or Brahmin and left summary the first few sources say Kayastha but have you checked the sources thoroughly ?
- The sources added by caliming him Kayastha are :
- 1. The first source is an aritcle of Pioneer which talks about mythical origin of Kayasthas not about Malviya. So this sources is completely waste here.
- 2. The second source is THE UNTAUGHT HISTORIAN which is a private wordpress website , which mentions him Kayastha Brahmin , now thw question is wtf is a Kayasth Brahmin ? And you know very well wordpress is web content management system that anyone can pay and start his own website.
- 3. The 3rd source is this Origins of the Kayastha Temperance Movement and in this article citation 27 says below thing :
- The congruence between temperance workers and activists in other fields of endeavour is not confined to the Kayasthas. For instance, the following gentlemen, whose names figured prominently in the public life of North India in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century were also prominent in temperance activities in the late nineteenth century : Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya; Ganga Prasad Varma; Bishan Narayan Dhar; Hamid Ali Khan; Pandit Ajodhia Nath; Pandit Bishamber Nath. The list is by no means complete.
- Here : not confined to Kayasthas means the names given like Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya; Ganga Prasad Varma; Bishan Narayan Dhar; Hamid Ali Khan; Pandit Ajodhia Nath; Pandit Bishamber Nath are not Kayastha which eventually proofs he was not a Kayastha.
- 4. And the 4th source is this article in which written below thing :
- There was, many years ago, a prize distribution at
- the Kayastha Pathshala at Allahabad where he (Malviya)
- and I had both gone. It was presided over by an English
- judge of the Allahabad High Court, who was accompa-
- nied by his unmarried young daughter, who looked the
- very picture of health and strength. At the close of the
- meeting Malayaji turned to me and said: “Did you notice
- anything?” I replied that I was myself thinking of that
- matter. He exclaimed, “when shall we have such girls in
- our country? (ibid, 107-8)
- Now after reading the paragrah it clearly shows Manmohan Singh & MM Malviya were gone to Kayastha Pathshala for prize distribution. And if this is a source than MM Singh can added as Kayastha(jokes apart)
- 5. Now 5th source is a tweet by a journo in which does not provide any source but wrote he was a Kayasth by his own will now same like him many journos do fake propoganda on twitter we should also believe them ? the answer is no until and unless there is a source.
- 6. Now I am giving you few more sources of him being a Brahmin:
- (i) BARTH RATNA PANDIT MADAN MOHANMALAVIYA HIGH - PRIEST OF INDIAN NATIONALISM (1861-1946.A.D) by Dr. M.RamagopalLecturer in HistoryS.A.R.M Degree College Allagadda, Kurnool District, ANDHRA PRADESH
- (ii) His Jayanti was celebrated by Gaur Brahmins every year as he was one of them. Some more link to this kind of news.
- (iii) Even he was criticised by orthodox Brahmins for his efforts to reform Hinduism as he was Brahmin.
- Now regarding to that Kayastha thing , Kayasthas as a community are doing online propoganda especially on Wikipedia. When I check history of the article Gaur Brahmins I found that they vandalized the whole wikipedia page of Gaur Brahmins. I am adding links below their vandalization :
- 1. This one claims there are no Gaur Brahmins but Kayasthas.
- 2. This one too in which he vandalized completley the whole page and he was the same guy who was re editing the page of MM Malviya and adding Kayastha in the article. You can cross check his contributions.
- I hope , I am able to put my points clearly. Arindam Vats (talk) 17:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message; it would have been better if you had posted the same on the article talk page. Anyway, I shall remain alert as far as any such POV-pushing in the article on Gaur Brahmin is concerned! I have added both the views considering WP:NPOV; you may post the details mentioned above in the article talk for further discussion. If you want, let other experienced editors express their opinion. Ekdalian (talk) 18:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the revert , I tried to write my concern on article talk page but not able to add. What should I do now ? Arindam Vats (talk) 04:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Use the 'Add topic' option. Ekdalian (talk) 06:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the revert , I tried to write my concern on article talk page but not able to add. What should I do now ? Arindam Vats (talk) 04:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message; it would have been better if you had posted the same on the article talk page. Anyway, I shall remain alert as far as any such POV-pushing in the article on Gaur Brahmin is concerned! I have added both the views considering WP:NPOV; you may post the details mentioned above in the article talk for further discussion. If you want, let other experienced editors express their opinion. Ekdalian (talk) 18:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Doremon9087 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Doremon9087. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Girth Summit (blether) 10:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.