User talk:ArinaVardanyan

January 2021

Hello ArinaVardanyan. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:ArinaVardanyan. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=ArinaVardanyan|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. SK2242 (talk) 22:29, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of HAY-HAY Fashion Concept Store

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on HAY-HAY Fashion Concept Store, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – Thjarkur (talk) 23:04, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paid articles can be submitted for review with WP:AFC, but shouldn't be directly created in mainspace. It is quite difficult to write neutrally about subjects one is close to, but we have plenty of already existing articles you could improve with us instead. – Thjarkur (talk) 23:09, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please fix your "paid" template

Thank you for putting the {{paid}} template on your user page.

Please replace the place-holder values for your employer and client with real ones. Thank you. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 🎄 23:48, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why has the paid template been removed entirely? SK2242 (talk) 12:40, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ArinaVardanyan. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 19:14, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ArinaVardanyan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. My account has been blocked, I understand this, however I have several reasons for the mistake I have made that I would appreciate if you accepted. Firstly when I was creating my account I added paid template, but I am not paid by anyone to write an article, I just consider the company Hay-Hay, for which I am working to be added in wikipedia with not promotional context, but just for information. Secondly, my first article (I understand I am not too experienced) has got speedy deletion status without giving me a single chance to edit it and write again from a neutral point of view. Hence my only chance was to start editing the article from another user page. Thirdly I would appreciate If Wikipedia has given me a chance to edit my article again by the Wikipedia policies and send for submission. I'd also like to contribute to other articles as well which are connected with Armenia. Thank youArinaVardanyan (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

None of this allows you to set up a new account to continue editing. I concur with the investigation, this appears to be a deliberate attempt to evade scrutiny. Yamla (talk) 21:11, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.