User talk:Ari bn Bem

March 2022

Hello, I'm Tommi1986. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Zodiac, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 11:46, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Miss America protest, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Blue Riband► 16:24, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This message is surely unnecessary, as I have already opened up a discussion on the material you have reverted, at Talk:Miss America protest. Ari bn Bem (talk) 16:31, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ari bn Bem, I replied to you on at Talk:Miss America protestBlue Riband► 17:16, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello, I'm Husond. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to 2022 Buffalo shooting—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Hús ö nd 11:09, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 Buffalo shooting. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Such-change47 (talk) 11:12, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits was not in accordance with the interests of the Cabal, and as soon as we figure out how to do so, it will be reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, or harsh realities and dark truths of Wikipedia bias you'd like to expose, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 11:14, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, if the chap who wrote the Great Replacement theory was a homosexual Frenchman, then that belongs on that article, not here. Please tell your Truth^TM elsewhere Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 11:21, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may rest assured thewhole internet is learning who Renaud Camus is alight speed, come out of your Bronze Age Ari bn Bem (talk) 11:22, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, do you think that everyone else on thee planet is so stupid that they couldn't look up Great Replacement or Renaud Camus themselves? If so, I'd recommend that you read this page Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 11:26, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may rest assured they are indeed looking up Renaud Camus just as I have, and talking about him on social media right now. Ari bn Bem (talk) 11:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I hope your efforts were worth an indefinite block with little chance of appeal. Goodbye. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 11:31, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 Buffalo shooting. Such-change47 (talk) 11:20, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sandstein 11:27, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ari bn Bem (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What happened here to me was unjust and needs more eyes. I AM here to build an encyclopedia.Ari bn Bem (talk) 11:35, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since you think that your contributions were proper, there are no grounds to remove the block. I don't see you being unblocked without a topic ban from the Buffalo shooting. 331dot (talk) 19:48, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ari bn Bem (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I dont understand what was improper without anyone explaining the violation, because I edit in good conscience. Ari bn Bem (talk) 20:45, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you truly don't see the problem with your edits, WP:CIR applies. Perhaps other sites are a better fit for your approach. Yamla (talk) 23:01, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.