User talk:Ardfern/Archive7
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ardfern. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2011 Archive
The article Connor, County Antrim has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- This article is almost exactly the same as Kells, County Antrim, of which both are one and same place as stated in this article. Difference being Connor isn't an actual settlement but rather a civil parish. This article is also unsourced.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mabuska (talk) 12:03, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Opportunity to comment on Batavia
There is a discussion starting up at Talk:Batavia (disambiguation), that may be of interest to you. The subject is technically a page move discussion, but the purpose of the discussion is to decide where Batavia should redirect. Until earlier today, Batavia redirected to History of Jakarta, but during this discussion, it is redirecting to Batavia (disambiguation). Your comments and suggestions are welcome.
Thanks for your help. HuskyHuskie (talk) 22:42, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
You are receiving this because you are one of the principal editors of one of the articles that is linked to Batavia (disambiguation). This notice is being posted to all of the top three editors of each of these articles (in terms of total edits), with the following exceptions:
- editors who are blocked
- anonymous IP editors
- editors who, despite ranking in the top three of edits to an article, have only a single edit to said article
This is an attempt to be a neutrally-phrased posting in keeping with the principles of WP:CANVASS. If you find anything in the wording or the manner posted to be a violation of that guideline, please notify me at my talk page.
The article Ballymully Glebe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Lack of notability. Whilst it is the townland where Tullyhogue Fort is located, it doesn't merit its own article on that basis as the Tullyhogue Fort article covers it.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mabuska (talk) 00:03, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Amber Airways, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://amber.clearfield.com/demo/amberairways.php.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:05, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:People from Galway
Category:People from Galway, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:11, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of 1642 in Ireland for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1642 in Ireland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1642 in Ireland until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
Laura Ashley protest pictures
I notice you uploaded four pictures of a Laura Ashley protest at commons:Category:Laura Ashley and commons:Category:Protests in Dublin but I was unable to understand the context. What are the pictures about? Why did the protest occur? Is the outcome known? I also took the liberty of wikilinking one of your pictures using this code: [[:en:Laura Ashley plc|Laura Ashley shop]]'. I think if you added a few words of context to support the pictures, it would give them added value for the viewer. — O'Dea (talk) 21:46, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
trying to connect Ardfern help...
hello i am bryan mckenna researching my family tree.i hope this gets to u .Ardfern.as i am a new user.In connection with your page on townland in co.armagh dated 16th jan.2009.cutting the story short my greatgranfather stated on the 1911 census of england that he was a resident of TUNASKANE.in armagh.as you are the only person ive found who has posted the name can you tell me any thing about its location in armagh or its history. He was born in 1847 but moved to newcastle upon tyne with his wife around about 1863.His name was john mckenna,or as he sometimes used Jon.My email address is bryan mckenna @ hotmail.co.uk.If its easier for you please make a reply on these pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.30.211.23 (talk) 20:52, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Chinguetti Airlines
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Chinguetti Airlines requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Russavia Let's dialogue 18:49, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
The article Chinguetti Airlines has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unnotable airline
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salvio Let's talk about it! 19:07, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
The article Laragh, County Fermanagh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non notability
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mabuska (talk) 11:52, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Johnsons Air
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Johnsons Air requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Spartaz Humbug! 19:42, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Aerogem Aviation
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Aerogem Aviation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Spartaz Humbug! 19:42, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Regarding File:Woodrow Stanley Lloyd.jpg
I have removed File:Woodrow Stanley Lloyd.jpg which you added to 1913 in Canada with this edit, because it does not have a valid non-free media use rationale for the article. Please see Wikipedia:Non-free content for the applicable policy and Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline if you want to address the issues. Thank you. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 09:18, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Regarding File:Woodrow Stanley Lloyd.jpg
I have removed File:Woodrow Stanley Lloyd.jpg which you added to 1972 in Canada with this edit, because it does not have a valid non-free media use rationale for the article. Please see Wikipedia:Non-free content for the applicable policy and Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline if you want to address the issues. Thank you. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 09:18, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
The article Aero Contractors (Nigeria) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Not notable
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:52, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Regarding File:Sylvia Fedoruk.jpg
I have removed File:Sylvia Fedoruk.jpg which you added to 1927 in Canada with this edit, because it does not have a valid non-free media use rationale for the article. Please see Wikipedia:Non-free content for the applicable policy and Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline if you want to address the issues. Thank you. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 13:00, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of 1200 in Ireland
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on 1200 in Ireland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Greenmaven (talk) 00:17, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Article for deletion
Speedy deletion nomination of The Troubles in Bleary
A tag has been placed on The Troubles in Bleary, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. SonofSetanta (talk) 15:20, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
- Further information and references added to the article to remove the threat of speedy deletion. This should not have been recommended for speedy deletion - it was not unsourceable and the nominator could have found and added sources if they could have been bothered. Ardfern (talk) 21:53, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
You created this article in 2006. That's 4 years you had to "be bothered". So please don't shake your finger at me. SonofSetanta (talk) 11:31, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
- The fact that I created an article does not mean that I own it or have personal responsibility for it. It was a stub to be built on by others through collaborative effort. No matter what, speedy deletion was not appropriate. Ardfern (talk) 11:48, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
You're kicking against the pricks. You know you should have done the work. SonofSetanta (talk) 12:53, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
- So should you - so easy to delete - so hard to be constructive. Cheers. Ardfern (talk) 12:59, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
I used that argument with someone else and their answer was that they thought Wikipedia was improved by deleting. Who's right and who's wrong? At any rate you've soorted it now so nothing's lost. SonofSetanta (talk) 16:50, 3 December 2011 (UTC)