User talk:ArdenM29

Welcome!

Hello, ArdenM29, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Effluent guidelines may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

''Effluent guidelines''' (also referred to as Effluent Limitation Guidelines (ELGs) are U.S. national standards for

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:24, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Anion Exchange Resin has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Anion Exchange Resin. Thanks! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 13:20, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Anion Exchange Resin (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 21:00, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Anion Exchange Resin concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Anion Exchange Resin, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anion Exchange Resin

Hello ArdenM29. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Anion Exchange Resin".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Anion Exchange Resin}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:16, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 28 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Small form-factor pluggable transceiver page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dead links

This edit seems a bit heavy-handed. Please read WP:LINKROT. Dead links should be restored or marked, not deleted. ~Kvng (talk) 13:50, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tzufun, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SmartSE (talk) 17:32, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SmartSE (talk) 10:11, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ArdenM29 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Edits to articles were made in good faith and sources of information cited, when needed, to show the legitimacy of edits. This account is not a sockpuppet account (I just found out what that is) or tied to anyone other than myself. My only intentions are to enhance the information presented in articles. I also correct grammatical errors and have myself deleted link spam from others. Please kindly reconsider this block. ArdenM29 (talk) 17:56, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I agree with Smartse's assessment below. Removing others' linkspam is no excuse for adding your own. Huon (talk) 18:32, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Example diffs

For the benefit of reviewers, here are some example diffs of refspamming: fotofab.com : [1] [2] [3] waterprofessionals.com: [4] [5] [6]. Over such an extended period it seemed very unlikely that this was not an orchestrated attempt to spam. To be clear, sockpuppetry was not the reason for the block and I only linked to it because I had presented evidence there. I couldn't find a single example of this user adding links that weren't poor quality infomercials on company websites. SmartSE (talk) 18:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]