User talk:Aravedis/sandbox

Your references could be improved Bergmanucsd (talk) 01:43, 7 June 2017 (UTC)bergmanucsd[reply]

(Peer Review)

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Most are yes, however there could be more in text citations.

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Nearly everything is relevant.

Is there anything that distracted you? Paragraph two seems to talk a lot about the roads. While I know that this is a part of what the World Bank has done I would focus more on the relationship between the two and less on specific projects. Also refrain from using language like ‘beautiful’ when referring to the scenery; it takes away from the legitimacy of the page.

Is the article neutral with neutral sources? Yes it is neutral.

Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No it is all rather neutral.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? I would like to see more on the overall relationship with the World Bank, and specific projects only mentioned.

Do the citation links work? No they do not, must be fixed.

Is there plagiarism in the article? No there is no plagiarism.

Is any information out of date? No all it up to date and relevant.

Is anything missing that could be added? This is a good start; I would fix the sources and add more in text citations, as well as information on the relationship between the two bodies. (Like in paragraph 1) Pckoenig (talk) 22:49, 9 June 2017 (UTC)Paul Koenig[reply]

Varun's Review •Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Yes he cites his sources. •Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Yes. - Is there anything that distracted you? No. •Is the article neutral with neutral sources? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? For the most part, I feel this is neutral, but he does spend a long time talking about the roads which make invoke sympathy. •Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? For the most part, no, but he does put too much focus on the roads. • Do the citation links work? No. - Is there plagiarism in the article? Can't tell since links don't work, but I think Aris is an honest man so I'll go with no. •Is any information out of date? No, there is not. But he should talk more about older issues vs focusing more on recent events. - Is anything missing that could be added? More information on older IMF interactions with his assigned country assuming they happened. Varunjitsingh6410 (talk)varunjitsingh6410 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Varunjitsingh6410 (talk • contribs) 00:56, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]