User talk:ArameanSyriac

August 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Ahiqar, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. JudeccaXIII (talk) 19:54, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:13, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New Message

Hello, ArameanSyriac. You have new messages at JudeccaXIII's talk page.
Message added JudeccaXIII (talk) 20:00, 13 December 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ArameanSyriac, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Mz7 (talk) 17:52, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:ArameanSyriac/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:ArameanSyriac/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.syriacstudies.com/AFSS/Syriac_Articles_in_English/Entries/2012/6/22_The_Syrian_Orthodox_Church_of_Antioch_At_A_Glance_Patriarch_Ignatius_Zakka_I_Iwas%2C_1983_Translated_by__Emmanuel_H._Bismarji..html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mz7 (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of sockpuppetry block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ArameanSyriac. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 21:35, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ArameanSyriac (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have seen that my account has ben blocked, but i still don´t understand for what kind of reason this has done? If i made a edit i always has tried to use sources/reference. And now i am blocked and still i don´t understand why? ArameanSyriac (talk) 21:31, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The explanation is literally right above this unblock request. Yamla (talk) 22:12, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ArameanSyriac (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you for your answer. Yes i have read the explanation. There is written something about "abusing multiple accounts". Does this mean I'm being accused of using multiple accounts on Wikipedia? If yes, then my answer is that this is not true. I have only one Wikipedia account and i don´t need another one. I don´t believe that there would be any proof dat i would have more than one Wikipedia account, because i only have/use one account! This is very disappointing because I am being wrongly accused of something I did not do. Hope that someone can check this again. Thank you! ArameanSyriac (talk) 19:23, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As every sockpuppet denies using sock accounts, a simple denial is insufficient. If you have not used other accounts, you will need to provide a plausible explanation as to why the available evidence indicates otherwise. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 00:14, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ArameanSyriac (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a very active or daily Wikipedia user. Maybe i don´t know everything or all user regulations here on Wikipedia, but i would never misuse them. Because i always wants to help wikipedia to spread truth about different subjects on the page. I say it again, I donß´t have or use another account than i have here now. How could i explain or proof this to convince you that i speak the truth? Thanks and hope to hear from you. ArameanSyriac (talk) 07:26, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given the evidence presented in the sockpuppet investigation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/ArameanSyriac/Archive and as 331dot mentioned above, a simple "I don't have a second account" is not enough of an explanation. You're going to need to read the page we linked and explain the overlap between your accounts. Unblock request declined. GeneralNotability (talk) 18:09, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ArameanSyriac (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As I mentioned before i am not a professional user of Wikipedia. But i know that when i use information from a website, that i also must write the source. I always did that. Can you maybe give me example how i can proof my right and that i have only one Wikipedia account? ArameanSyriac (talk) 16:27, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No response to the below questions in nine days. If you make another request it really needs to address those, and in detail. We're already being generous by letting you request unblock a fourth time. Any further unblock request that does not directly address the sockpuppetry we believe you have engaged in should not only be declined ASAP but should result in a revocation of talk page access. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:29, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You need to think about why someone else would think that you have more than one account and address that, if you do not have more than one account. Every improper user of multiple accounts denies it, so that's not enough. You may look at the investigation yourself. 331dot (talk) 16:45, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest that you consider it carefully, because you might lose access to this page too should your requests continue to be unproductive. 331dot (talk) 16:46, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]