User talk:Araboud

March 2024

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Dhurma Massacre (1818). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Unknown-Tree🌲? (talk) 03:43, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Unknown-Tree🌲? (talk) 04:32, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

How am I not being neutral? I have added some important details which have not been mentioned and altered incorrect details. And I am a Saudi, so who are you to tell me my own history? Araboud (talk) 12:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

For example, you called the people of Dhurma "brave", which is a violation of the neutral point of view—such claims must be attributed per WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV. In some of your edit summaries, you claim you are a historian and have "asked citizens of Dhurma"; however original research is not allowed on Wikipedia, and neither are primary sources—especially citizens of a town some 200 years after the event.

I am not trying to "tell you your own history", but instead I am following the guidelines that statements in Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, secondary sources. Unknown-Tree🌲? (talk) 15:42, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Dhurma Massacre (1818). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. R Prazeres (talk) 18:09, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

Your recent editing history at Article shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.ⵟⵓⵔⴽⵉⵙⵀⴽⴰⴱⵢⵍ (talk) 19:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Expedition to Najd (1817–1818). ThaddeusSholto (talk) 22:17, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 22:13, 24 March 2024 (UTC)