Jump to content

User talk:Arabianlenzo17898

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2021

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arabianlenzo17898 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here Arabianlenzo17898 (talk) 01:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC) i forgot my passowrd but now i have it saved. sorry for my mistake i have learnt my lesson, and i promise that i will not make another account.[reply]

Decline reason:

One open request at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:51, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arabianlenzo17898 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i didnt get a response other then to make one appeal at a time so could u please review my appeal again. also i didnt mean to go againts the rules, i have learnt my lesson, and i wont repeat what i did, and know why i was blocked. I have reflected on what i did, and now have a better understaning of wikipeda. and im requesting WP:2nd chance i really hope i would get a second chance because its the new year season. I promise i will not repeat my actions and if you gave me another chance i would gladly show you Those are my reasons why my block is no longer necessary. @Alexf: also happy new years

Decline reason:

Unfortunately the additional sockpuppetry has turned this appeal into a waste of time. -- Euryalus (talk) 19:35, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Daniel Case: incase you didnt see ive left a few emails for you.

Hi. What are your other accounts? -- Euryalus (talk) 20:57, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


All the arabian lenzo accounts @Euryalus: @Euryalus:

Yep, thanks. Obviously you weren't trying to hide your username, but why did you make all these accounts? Re your emailed question, the blocking admin hasn't said anything yet. Also, you reference the "second chance" but you haven't as yet followed the instructions in it. I think you might actually be thinking of the standard offer which generally requires six months without sockpuppetry. -- Euryalus (talk) 10:09, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


thank you for replying, i created all those accounts because i forgot my password, and didn't log my self in for 365 days. also my internet connection was lagging so i just made a new account. thanks for correcting me, is the standard offer 6 months without editing/making articles, or 6 months without sockpupetry?. thanks @Euryalus:

@Euryalus:, this user has been now CU blocked for further evasion as detailed in the SPI case linked in my block notice below. You may want to decline the unblock request due to the evasion, but as it's now a CU block you will need to consult a CU before you can accept this unblock request. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 18:14, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arabianlenzo17898 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here The Harar account was created by me, but is a mobile account which We used on my sisters mobile, however I didn’t really edit on that account, because I’ve been trying to get unblocked on this account. The editor on that account Is my sister, and we probably do share the same IP. I normally edit on my computer. Again I know I shouldn’t have made that account, the only reason I created that account was because if I got unbanned on this account my sister, and Me could focus on East African topics, and on this account I could edit on Arabian topics, that is the whole reason I changed my username. I don’t think the mobile account will edit on Wikipedia anymore I really do hope I can be given another chance, thanks. @Euryalus: } Arabianlenzo17898 (talk) 22:50, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unfortunately the "my sister/brother/roommate did it" excuse is so old and tired it has become a meme. As above, given the repeated sockpuppetry there is no prospect that I will unblock this account outside the standard offer of six months without socking. Note that persistent misuse of the unblock template also risks you losing access to this talkpage. -- Euryalus (talk) 22:57, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Euryalus: since youy do not believe what i have told you, i'm happy to accept the standard offer. but is their anyway my time can be reduced?.

Hi there. There's no need to keep emailing me. When you have a moment, check out the standard offer essay which says "at least six months." -- Euryalus (talk) 04:54, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon, regarding the Standard offer, the essay mentions that in some occasions the time span of the block can be reduced, and thanks for letting me know. @Euryalus:

Yes it does, but do you really think you have "shown unusually good insight into the circumstances leading to the block?" You continue to deny some incredibly obvious sockpuppetry at the article on the Egyptian invasion of Hararghe. This isn't a pathway to an early unblock. -- Euryalus (talk) 06:15, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Arabianlenzo178 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arabianlenzo178. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 18:06, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I'm very sorry for denying, and i was created a account on my sisters mobile. those edits were mine, but the account was on my sisters mobile. im sorry for denying that. It just seems to me like 6 months is a very longtime. Is there anyway I can convince you to unblock me before the 6 months. if I was given a chance sooner I would show you that this block was not necessary , and I would make more productive edits. I will make sure this mistake will never happen again. I didn't come here to go against the wiki policies, I came here to create articles which i thought would be suitable on a Encylopedia like this, and to improve articles which desperately need to be improved. i have looked into the policies, and understand that what I did was wrong. @Euryalus:.

You need to stop posting comments. You will not be unblocked for at least six months, not fewer. The standard offer doesn't guarantee an unblock; it just means that an unblock request at that time will be considered. If you persist in arguing that you should be unblocked sooner, I will revoke access to this page.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:37, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


whats your say @Euryalus:

is closed. Noting check user block. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:58, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]