User talk:Apsweaver

APS split from APA

Apsweaver, as I understand it, the APS was founded by psychologists who left the APA because they believed that psychotherapies should be evidence-based.

They believed the APA had members who were practicing therapies that were not evidence-based, that had sometimes been demonstrated to be ineffective in randomized trials, and had sometimes even been demonstrated to be harmful.

They wanted the APA to condemn these therapies, and the APA wouldn't do so.

Is that true? --Nbauman (talk) 16:41, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nbauman, APS was formed by a group of psychologists who believe that all psychological research should be based in science (including treatments). Apsweaver (talk) 16:17, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William James Fellow Award, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John R. Anderson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Apsweaver. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by I, JethroBT ^{drop me a line} 16:54, 9 December 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clinical Psychological Science has been accepted

Clinical Psychological Science, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 05:32, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]