User talk:ApparenzA

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, ApparenzA, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 22:36, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} Thank you for your note! I am trying to create a number of redirects to accommodate spelling variations in the titles of the articles I just set up i.e. Scottevest, Inc., SCOTTEVEST Inc, SCOTTEVEST/SeV, etc. I read the directions for how to set up a redirect, but I wanted to ask if setting up 10+ spelling variations for an entry is good/acceptable practice? Mostly they are minor. Thank you for your help!

ApparenzA (talk) 12:25, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects from plausible spelling variations are ok. If there is significant likelihood that someone will actually type the spelling variation in a search box, then it is probably ok. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 14:21, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} One of the articles I created is "Scott Jordan (entrepreneur)" but there is another article about a different person titled "Scott Jordan" to which all searches default. There is a third Scott Jordan article ("Scott Jordan (baseball)") which is also bypassed in favor of the default article. What is the procedure to rename the article "Scott Jordan" to "Scott Jordan (football)" or otherwise present the reader with the three options that exist for "Scott Jordan" bios? Thank you for your help! ApparenzA (talk) 04:44, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Looks like we need a disambiguation page. I'll try to sort it out shortly, and get back to you. Cheers, Chzz ► 04:56, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All sorted out, I think/hope. I moved the old Scott Jordan page to Scott Jordan (footballer), then I created the disambiguation page Scott Jordan, and added 'hatnotes' to all 3 articles, so that they have links to the disambig at the top.

Hope this is all OK - if not, drop me a note on my talk page, cheers, Chzz ► 05:41, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That is perfect - thank you Chzz! ApparenzA (talk) 09:49, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- Rrburke (talk) 20:08, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Technology enabled clothing

The article Technology enabled clothing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

All content already included in article on Scottevest

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Racconish^Tk 21:18, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Scott Jordan (entrepreneur)

The article Scott Jordan (entrepreneur) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability inherited from Scottevest. Everything notable about Scott Jordan is already in the article on Scottevest.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Racconish^Tk 14:58, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Scottevest for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scottevest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scottevest until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JFHJr (㊟) 17:06, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Scottevest

The article Scottevest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a directory or platform for advertising. The company is not notable; it has little to no coverage in independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- John Reaves 18:36, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Scottevest for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scottevest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scottevest (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- John Reaves 18:38, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]