User talk:Apostle Samsoin

Ad template

Plz Add {{Edit fully-protected}} on Page Jai Rudra (kathir) to prevent vendalism Adam Sir Jr. (talk) 17:59, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Adam Sir Jr.: Administrators will only protect pages that are actually being vandalized. It looks like you're talking about Kathir (jai Rudra). Is that article being vandalized? CityOfSilver 18:40, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@City of silver: Ok As Per Your Conversation Ill Understand the detail Now, thank you very much For Your help... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apostle Samsoin (talk • contribs) 02:10, November 22, 2017 (UTC)

Kathir Dhananjay

Hi there, re: your creation of Kathir (jai Rudra), I moved it to Kathir Dhananjay, because the article was not properly disambiguated. Secondly, and more importantly, I have to nominate this article for deletion, because I don't see any indication that this guy is notable per either our notability guidelines for actors or per our general notability guideline, which says that a subject is notable if it "has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." This means you would need to provide in-depth articles written about this guy, (not interviews) as published in mainstream publications. IMDb and spicyonion are poor sources that do nothing to establish the subject's notability. Even these:[1][2] are just passing mentions, which also do nothing to establish notability. If you have any questions, feel free to ask, but there is a very low chance this article will survive until you properly establish notability. Maybe the guy will get more work in the next few years and that'll help, but presently, it's too soon. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:47, 23 November 2017 (UTC) @Cyphoidbomb: Ok As Per Wikipedia guidelines We Accepted all the changes made in articel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apostle Samsoin (talk • contribs) 01:30, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kathir Dhananjay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kathir Dhananjay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathir Dhananjay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:01, 23 November 2017 (UTC) @Cyphoidbomb: Thanks"cyphoidbomb" For You Consideration but as per your Conversation I Was Ad Some Strpng evidemce on article So now Remobe the nomination Tag from there....Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apostle Samsoin (talk • contribs) 13:25, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Hi there, re: these edits, we only care what mainstream reliable sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy have to say about anything. Random blogs or random websites you find on the internet are useless, as anyone can start a website and print whatever they want. Stick to major news sites. Note also that IMDb may not be used as a reference, because it is user-contributed, and thus, not inherently reliable. See WP:RS, WP:RS/IMDB. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:54, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb::ok Dear! now i am understand the detail for reference edit that help me for better editing in future — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apostle Samsoin (talk • contribs) 18:16, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Please also remember to sign your posts with four tildes like: ~~~~. This will append a signature and time stamp to your comments like this: --> Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:29, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Odd misuse of templates

Hi there, is there a reason why you keep weirdly adding {{Archive bottom}}[3], {{Archive top}}[4] and {{Old AfD multi}}[5][6]. You're not using any of these templates correctly, so it's unclear what you are trying to do. The Old AfD template belongs on article talk pages, and they are added by the person who closes an AfD. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:55, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Vikrant Anand (actor)

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Vikrant Anand (actor) to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:54, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Hello, I'm Tolly4bolly. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Shah Rukh Khan have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tolly 4 bolly 09:55, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabrang (2018 Film)

If you do anything like this again I will ask for you to be blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:47, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Niranjan Bharti

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Niranjan Bharti requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. FITINDIA 17:49, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Ankit G Dubey (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:09, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]