Jump to content

User talk:ApocalypseNow115

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, ApocalypseNow115, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Kingturtle (talk) 00:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:HSM-71-Logo.gif

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:HSM-71-Logo.gif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:06, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for Image:Ebdelta.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ebdelta.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:41, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Modern Whig Party

[edit]

Hello... I am assigned with monitoring this page. Many of your contributions have been good and backed-up by proper citation. However, I see no citation where the party has endorsed radical middle or freethought. The forums indicate that the party leadership has not adopted radical middle, and a party founded by veterans likely will not endorse a freethought movement that has a pansy as a logo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aardvark31 (talkcontribs) 03:41, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your modified owl logo is very good. The reason the radical ideology was removed is because you do not have any citations for it. Also, in the forums you used, the member known as modernwhig is known to speak for the national committee, and he rejected the idea. The ain party web site does list modern whig philosophy so that is ok to keep. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aardvark31 (talkcontribs) 13:49, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes random people go and change weird things. I don't think the guy who changed the colors to blue and red was acting in bad faith though. I usually check and watch out for vandalism. Awhile back, the defunct racist American Whig Party kept vandalizing the page and throwing in anti-Semitic and racist comments. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aardvark31 (talkcontribs) 13:20, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you edit, write for Neolibertarian blog, etc?

[edit]

I'll comment on the additions in the libertarianism article, but per WP:COI I'm asking you here if you have a personal connection to this issue?? Do you know anything about this article I just discovered? Thanks. CarolMooreDC (talk) 16:21, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am not connected in any way to that blog or any other blog. But I do feel this subject deserves an article. If you are trying to assert I have some sort of conflict of interest or I am being un-fair in my addition, I do not and am not. If you are simply refering to the blog posting on the LDC website, that has to do with them only. That's just how they set up their website. ApocalypseNow115 (talk) 17:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. I assuming your answer also means you are also not related to ttp://www.qando.net/ or http://neo-libertarian.com/forpolphil.html. CarolMooreDC (talk) 17:33, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No I am not. ApocalypseNow115 (talk) 17:34, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Social Democracy on the Democratic Page

[edit]

Considering my edits are the default, could you please discuss this on the Democract Talkpage before re-adding Social Democracy? I have posted why I think it should not be added. Thanks. --Saffron831 (talk) 00:07, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

[edit]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Winnipeg Jets. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kindly cease reverting this article without a reliable source explicitly stating that the team colors are as you claim they are. The only source published by the team does not state what the team colors are at all, and that they will be published at a later date.  ῲ Ravenswing ῴ  12:17, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:400px-Black Eagles flag.png listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:400px-Black Eagles flag.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 20:35, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:17, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Winnipeg Jets, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 23:58, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:DEVGRU Shoulder Flash copy.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]