Jump to content

User talk:Apertus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Reverse Prince Albert piercing, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Reverse Prince Albert piercing was changed by Apertus (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-04-28T18:08:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:08, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reported a false positive to ClueBot. Apertus (talk) 18:25, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Prince Albert piercing constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Prashanthns (talk) 18:10, 28 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]

My bad; a typo slipped in with a legitimate edit. I've made the correction. Apertus (talk) 18:25, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your rollback request

[edit]

Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Denied/August 2008#Apertus. SoxBot X (talk) 02:00, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bite the Brown on Anilingus

[edit]

You are dead wrong on this one. Apertus, did you take any time to read the logical defense that I've put up vis-a-vis "bite the brown"? If not, I suggest you do and then tell me if I'm out of line. Every argument and objection to the addition of the term was met by me with a coherent response. For that, I've been bullied, banned and called a "vandal". See you on the 17th when the protection of anilingus expires - I have it on my calendar.

Thanks, and apologies

[edit]

Hi. Thanks for this edit reverting a bit of vandalism to my user page. I'm afraid that I inadvertently and incorrectly reverted that with WP:Twinkle, probably incorrectly identifying it to Twinkle]] as vandalism. Apologies for that. I've self-reverted that change and, AFAICS, Twinkle didn't issue any vandalism warning. Sorry about the mistake. -- Boracay Bill (talk) 01:26, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all; thanks for noticing! Apertus (talk) 09:14, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]