User talk:Ap2296

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ap2296 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason for unblock

Decline reason:

No reason given. Elockid ^(Talk) 16:23, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ap2296 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Unblock Subcommittee, I am an old contributor of Wikipedia. I recently wrote a new article about the company I happened to work for. Mazor_Robotics. To my opinion, the article was written in a very natural and professional way, meeting the Wikipedia high standards. Once the article was published I offered co-workers to go online and make changes, I was not aware of the issue of violating Wikipedia e Sockpuppet rules, and as everyone is working in same LAN, I was blocked as "abusing multiple accounts". I do understand that I violated Wikipedia rules by asking co workers to contribute to the article, and I commit not to violate this rule again. But please be generous and accept my apology and my explanation that it was an innocent mistake. I was NOT using multiple account names, and I have no intention of doing so. also, I was not writing ANY promotional marital, and was sticking to the Wikipedia high standard rules. thank you for listening Ap2296 (talk) 16:29, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were using Wikipedia to post a promotional article for a company with which you say you affiliated for financial gain. For these reasons your unblock request is declined. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 17:24, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.