User talk:Anzer Ayoob

March 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 16:34, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anzer Ayoob (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wrongly have been blocked from editing or adding information with valid references. I was not advertising. The Chenab Times is a real news portal and i was starting article on it. But as i have not any article which got approved before. But i have lots of contributions in many articles. Just like i have contributed on Thathri, i have collected information from census 2011 of india and updated on the said article. I have gave my precious time to collect to accurate information which i believe to be informative for readers. It was not advertising. Why I have been blocked now? I added valid reference from official websites. Yes in past i wrote some articles which was advertisement, because i was beginner and I don't had much knowledge about that policy. After deletion of that article i only contributed as per guidelines of Wikipedia. I know advertisement of myself is not allowed. So I wrote article on The Chenab Times which is top leading news portal in Chenab Valley added in two references. I was searching more online references for the article for the authenticity of the article. And i believe that i have contributed alot to Wikipedia, so that Wikipedia admin will trust my new contribution. But now i believe i have wasted time to improve Wikipedia. Please unblock me and recover the article i made on The Chenab Times, so that i can add more references for its authenticity.Anzer Ayoob (talk) 18:24, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not a vehicle for self-promotion. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:02, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Last message

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anzer Ayoob (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't expect, i would get this type of demotivation from being a good contributor. Well, it's your choice Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request. Please do not use the {{unblock}} template unless you are actually appealing against the block. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:03, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Good contributors have read and complied with WP:COI and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 09:47, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot remove declined unblock requests while blocked, I have restored them. 331dot (talk) 12:53, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I want to delete my account or change username.

Whoever types my name on Google, it show my Wikipedia user page. I did lot of contribution for wiki. But you guys did an unappreciative things with me. I don't want my name on wiki. So plz tell me how to change for this account. Or delete this account. Anzer Ayoob (talk) 16:03, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry you feel that way, but there are certain policies you would need to comply with if you wanted to remain. If you don't wish to participate here, that is your choice. Accounts cannot be deleted. If you no longer wish to use it, simply abandon it. Your user page can(and will) be deleted if you wish. You can't change your username until you are unblocked first. 331dot (talk) 16:07, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Delete my userpage so that it will not appear on Google. Google is already showing about me in a good way. Just type "Who is Anzer Ayoob" on Google you will get some results. Anyway, please delete my userpage. One thing I want to tell you that what i did which violates guidelines of wiki that was in past. When i was beginner. And most of the beginners do that mistake. Wikipedia is the best platform for information. I was not aware what will happen. Because there are some YouTube videos which compels me to so. Just like i searched "How to write article about any company on Wikipedia" and a video prompt me to make article. I don't know how to start an draft article, so that other contributors will contribute on the same. Or what is requirements for article. Because Wikipedia policies are written in complicated manner.

On the other hand you may have seen my contribution on Thathri town article. I added census source which was informative for readers.

Now your choice, you can unblock me or not. But remove my userpage. I shall be grateful to you. Anzer Ayoob (talk) 03:03, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The account you used to evade this block, User:Anzer Creation, is now blocked. You must resolve this block before creating a new account. 331dot (talk) 01:03, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock and evading reason

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anzer Ayoob (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason I was blocked is that I was promoting my self in new articles about me which is not allowed on Wikipedia. Yes, I apologise. At that time, I was a geek person and I was trying that things without knowing the terms of use of Wikipedia. Now I understood the laws and policies. Also, when I was blocked, I was not warned. Warning is solution to stop most user from misusing wiki. Maybe you warned, but don't got it. Kindly now unblock me. For the reason of evading, yes I created new account, as I didn't remind the password of this one and not wanted to come again with stamps of my previous mistakes. So I created new account User:Anzer Creation . Now unblock both of my accounts. And I want to run new one. Thanks in advance. -- Anzer Ayoob (talk) 01:24, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deep fried okra 01:40, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anzer Ayoob (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Administrator, the block is no longer necessary because I understood what I have been blocked for. Now will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and I will make useful contributions instead. Anzer Ayoob (talk) 01:51, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

All you did was copy-paste the instructions. And add a whole lot of pings. To stop you from annoying more admins, your talk page access has been revoked. You'll need to use WP:UTRS to appeal your block. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:20, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Deepfriedokra: Anzer Ayoob (talk) 02:23, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Spencer: please check the request for unblock. Anzer Ayoob (talk) 04:04, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: Can You please review the unblocking request! Or please tell me how much time a request takes to be reviewed. I am not connected to my email, so please let me know. Anzer Ayoob (talk) 04:21, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Why any admin are not responding?

Dear administrators of Wikipedia,

I have submitted a unblock request, kindly review it asap. I am using Wikipedia fairly now without any self promotion. I came again after a year of block here to join Wikipedia selflessly. You can check all my new contributions are selflessly contributed. I understand self promotion is not allowed on Wikipedia, for which I was blocked last year's March. Please review my unblock request soon. Tag: @331dot: @Spencer: @49TL: @Acdixon: or any other.

- Anzer Ayoob (talk) 04:35, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Anzer Ayoob (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #28760 was submitted on 2020-01-30 07:26:21. This review is now closed.