User talk:Anupam 87

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Anupam 87/कराग्रे वसते लक्ष्मी has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/कराग्रे वसते लक्ष्मी, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 08:28, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/कराग्रे वसते लक्ष्मी.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:44, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Submission Rejected: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/कराग्रे वसते लक्ष्मी

Hi,

I want to know more details, why the Submission was rejected.

There are various sources from where you can verify my content and every Hindu knows the value of this mantra:

Sanskrit / संस्कृत: कराग्रे वसते लक्ष्मी, करमध्ये सरस्वती | करमूले तू गोविन्दं, प्रभाते करदर्शनम ||

You can ask any of your Indian Friend for verification of this content. Its really sad for me that I need to provide proof for this Great mantra written many many years ago and prayed by every Hindu, in the morning.

Regards, Anupam — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anupam 87 (talk • contribs) 06:18, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hiyas there Anupam,

The basis of any encyclopedic article on Wikipedia is that the content must be verifiable trough external sources, no matter the topic of the article itself. These sources must also be considered reliable before they can be used in the article itself, and the burden of evidence always lies with the person adding the content.

Now, the question you ask also ask is "Why would i have to do that?", and of course, that is a sensible thing to ask. If millions of people use this Mantra, it may seem to be strange that you have to prove something that seems to be so obvious. The reason for this is that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and therefor in turn little more then a summary of reliable sources. Also keep in mind that every Wikipedia article is written by a random contributer, and without reliable sources there is no means to validate if that contributer knew what he or she was writing about. Alternatively, what would happen if the mantra is slightly different in some places in the world, and two contributers disagree over it? Or what would happen if i were to change the mantra slightly and claim this is the correct version while yours is wrong? Who would be right, and how would you verify that? That is why reliable sources are required; with these, one can simply read the source and check what was written without a hassle, and determine of the article content is correct. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 10:19, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]