User talk:Anunarwana

This is Anunarwana's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shri Hit Premanand Govind Sharan Ji Maharaj (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://geetabhagwat.com/shri-hit-premanand-ji-maharaj/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Shri Hit Premanand Govind Sharan Ji Maharaj may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Atlantic306 (talk) 22:45, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anunarwana! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Atlantic306 (talk) 22:45, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atlantic306. I appreciate your inputs. I would like to tell that I have now written the article in my own language. Please re review it. Anunarwana (talk) 23:06, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it needs to be in English and referenced to reliable sources such as newspapers, books, well known reliable websites and such like in order for it to be approved for mainspace, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 23:10, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is the draft deleted now or I can add reliable sources? Anunarwana (talk) 23:15, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shri Hit Premanand Ji Maharaj

Hello Anunarwana,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Shri Hit Premanand Ji Maharaj for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

VickKiang (talk) 04:02, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Shri Hit Premanand Ji Maharaj

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Shri Hit Premanand Ji Maharaj, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2A00:23EE:1478:6AAC:D41C:52FF:FE2C:4707 (talk) 06:11, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Shri Hit Premanand Govind Sharan Ji Maharaj

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Shri Hit Premanand Govind Sharan Ji Maharaj, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2A00:23EE:1478:6AAC:D41C:52FF:FE2C:4707 (talk) 06:12, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shri Hit Premanand Ji Maharaj (August 9)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was:

This page appears to have been written to praise its subject rather than to describe the subject neutrally. Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view.

If this draft is resubmitted without being reworked, it may be nominated for deletion. You may ask for advice about the tone of articles at the Teahouse.

This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that one of the biographical notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the biographical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:GNG for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission. If this draft is resubmitted, or an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection, a topic-ban or a partial block may be requested against the submitting editor, and the draft may be nominated for deletion.

You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:40, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:29, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir,

Just because I am new to wikipedia, I didn't know your wikipedia policy and I wrote the specific article in a good to go blogpost form. in neither way I am advertising or spamming so please review the block.

i can assure you my content will never be the same and definitely not spammy ever. Anunarwana (talk) 20:16, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anunarwana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear sir, I am new to wikipedia. I was not spamming and I was trying to write about a revered spiritual personality in India so just because I dont exactly know the policy of wikipedia I made some mistakes. In no way, it was a spam. I just used some blogpost kind of article that I myself wrote. I didn't know about encyclopedic style

Decline reason:

Your article was one of the most inappropriate I've ever seen in my years here. Nothing here convinces me you understand how deeply inappropriate it was for an encyclopedia. Yamla (talk) 22:52, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don't understand just 1 thing now that how should I just try to convince you because I clearly accepted my mistake and I understand now what encyclopedic content means. And I have assured that I won't repeat it. Still if you don't want to unblock I am not gonna beg you, because in any case if i wanted to advertise through wikipedia it just takes some 20-25 dollars to do so through some sources.