User talk:Anujkaps
Anujkaps, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Anujkaps! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 29 July 2016 (UTC) |
Nomination of Chamba Chukh for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chamba Chukh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chamba Chukh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gestrid (talk) 16:41, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
[edit]Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Gestrid (talk) 16:53, 29 July 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.
Talkback
[edit]Message added 17:01, 29 July 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Gestrid (talk) 17:01, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Please read the policy against canvassing, recruiting editors non-neutrally in order to influence a consensus discussion. This policy in particular applies to Requests for Comments and deletion discussions. In particular, inviting new editors to join Wikipedia in order to influence an ongoing consensus discussion is strongly discouraged, and the opinions of newly recruited or canvassed editors will normally be discounted by the closer. It appears that you have been canvassing in a deletion discussion in order to try to prevent deletion of an article that you may have written. Don't do that. It isn't effective. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:39, 30 July 2016 (UTC)