User talk:Antonis372

This is Antonis372's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: External Rate of Return (ERR) Platform (January 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://economia.icaew.com/opinion/april-2016/environmental-social-and-governance-issues. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly exists under a compatible licence and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:External Rate of Return (ERR) Platform may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

joe decker ^talk 23:49, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Antonis372, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! joe decker ^talk 23:49, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Florman

Hello. Do you know Mark? Do you work for him? --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 16:18, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I work for a design agency that is handling Mark's online presence. Antonis372, 17:13, 19 January 2017

Thanks for replying. You need to read this, urgently: WP:COI. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 14:26, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll need to report this at WP:COIN --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 14:28, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to let you know that editing Mark Florman's wikipedia entry is done on a pro bo basis and it is not paid. Everything that is added is carefully cited. Should I use {{request edit}} on the talk page from now on to make edits? Antonis372, 16:48, 20 January 2017

@Antonis372: Could you please copy and merge your statements from above into a disclosure, and place it on your user page (User:Antonis372)? That would be a proper declaration of your conflict of interest and also give other editors confidence that you're editing in good faith.

You said your work is pro bono, but nonetheless I think it's a good idea that you review Wikipedia's paid editing disclosure rules. If at any time you receive (or expect to receive) compensation for your work on Wikipedia on behalf of a client, you will need to abide by those rules. Thanks for your cooperation. --Drm310 (talk) 18:03, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. If you have a conflict of interest, all edits that you wish to implement should be proposed on the article's talk page with the {{request edit}} template. Regards, VB00 (talk) 16:50, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: External Rate of Return (ERR) Platform (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

Please add a lead section to summarize the article's key points so readers unfamiliar with the topic will be able to understand it better.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:External Rate of Return (ERR) Platform and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 14:32, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paviors Lodge Number 5646 (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Winged Blades of Godric was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paviors Lodge Number 5646 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Winged Blades^Godric 13:58, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: External Rate of Return (ERR) Platform (April 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not resubmit unless substantial improvements are made to this draft. Doing so repeatedly could be possibly considered tendentious editing and could result in an administrator deleting this draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:External Rate of Return (ERR) Platform and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 21:30, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Paviors and City Livery Chapter Number 5646

Hello Antonis372,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Paviors and City Livery Chapter Number 5646 for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Mduvekot (talk) 14:40, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Paviors Lodge Number 5646 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Paviors Lodge Number 5646, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:55, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:External Rate of Return (ERR) Platform concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:External Rate of Return (ERR) Platform, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:59, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Paviors Lodge Number 5646

Hello, Antonis372. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Paviors Lodge Number 5646".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:32, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:External Rate of Return (ERR) Platform

Hello, Antonis372. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "External Rate of Return (ERR) Platform".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 18:44, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about External Rate of Return (ERR) Platform

Hello, Antonis372,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether External Rate of Return (ERR) Platform should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/External Rate of Return (ERR) Platform .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:41, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Paviors Lodge Number 5646

Hello, Antonis372,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Paviors Lodge Number 5646 should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paviors Lodge Number 5646 .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:46, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your custom signature

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. 05:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)