User talk:Antonell 1983/Archive 1

Speedy deletion nomination of TXT e-solutions

A tag has been placed on TXT e-solutions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 13:48, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 13:49, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at TXT e-solutions

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with TXT e-solutions. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 14:01, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of TXT Perform

A tag has been placed on TXT Perform, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of TXT Perform and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eeekster (talk) 10:34, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the page, as well as a couple of others.

When you create pages, please make sure that they are notable enough, and that they are suitable as an article. Also, make sure that they do not promote or advertise. Have a look at WP:BFAQ, which give some more explanations. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 10:39, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re-linking

I have re-removed the external links in the body of the text. Such items should not be external links (see Wikipedia:External links). They could be internal links if they could link to notable content, but since that was deleted (by me .. as the information there was clearly promotional and not notable) no such target exists.

I strongly advice you to read the spam guideline and the business FAQ, and maybe the conflict of interest guideline. We are writing an encyclopedia here, not an advertising service. Thanks. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 09:42, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh. See this as a final warning:

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Wikipedia.

Please first do something about the concerns that are mentioned in the tags, and then the tags can be removed (preferably not by you, but by an uninvolved editor). Have a good look at what is written in our policies and guidelines, again we are not here to promote this company. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 08:30, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]