Jump to content

User talk:Antignomi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Antignomi! I noticed your contributions to Federalist Society and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Marquardtika (talk) 19:40, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thank you, I haven't make any contributions to Federalist Society. I simply added a link for a professor emeritus who was quoted in the article but it turned red. It turned red because no one has created an article for that Professor yet. Thanks for the welcome all the same Antignomi (talk) 02:30, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve The Legislation of Morality

[edit]

Hello, Antignomi,

Thank you for creating The Legislation of Morality.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The current article is a well-referenced precis of the book, but doesn't given evidence for the notability of the book. That is, it shows that the topic is important, but not that this book is important. If this can't be demonstrated, then a merge to Troy Duster might be best.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Klbrain (talk) 19:41, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Klbrain: I read over the article again and I see that the text could be improved to make it clear that four authors Finestone, Hagan, Park, Henkin are reviews of the book, not about the general topic. That is important. They are discussing the book. It would not be appropriate to take out of context. I will try to fix this sooner rather than later. Antignomi (talk) 14:19, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]