User talk:Anthro2010

Welcome!

Hello, Anthro2010, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Popular Anthropology Magazine, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Crusio (talk) 21:16, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Popular Anthropology Magazine

The article Popular Anthropology Magazine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

New magazine, just started this year. Cannot be notable yet, no independent references, no indication of notability. Article creation premature. Does not meet WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 21:16, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spamming or advertising. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--Orange Mike | Talk 21:20, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anthro2010 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Blocking me was both premature and unwarranted, as can be plainly seen by my other contributions on Wikipedia. In addition, I have made significant contributions to other pages that I did not create, specifically regarding the inclusion of numerous citations and style. Clearly, at the time of the deletion I was working on building that page. If I was a "spammer" or "advertiser," I wouldn't have bothered to fix and update other pages that I did not create- Examples: Smadar Lavie entry, Agustin Fuentes entry, Izumi Shimada entry, and etc. When I completed pages, I did not "abandon" them, but instead continued to work on them, improving their content. Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

Yes, but then you went on a tear where you created the article and then added links to the magazine to other articles in a fashion that can only be called spamming. Your name also raises some questions. Do you have any connection to this publication? — Daniel Case (talk) 03:59, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.