User talk:Anthony morgan peters
ALWAYS FORGIVE & TEACH THE NOOB,
Hello there, First off I am still learning wikiepidia. So If you are here because I did something wrong just tell me what I did and why it was wrong. By the way I will report you if you put in a vandal message. Oh and please watch your language please do not use profanity in your message thankyou ,
Socialcasting
[edit]Got your note on the socialcasting page. I am happy to help make it a wikified discussion page.Allthingstoallpeople (talk) 21:23, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
North American Union ≠ North American Republic
[edit]Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I reverted your good faith additions to the North American Union article. This article covers the merger of the United States, Canada, and Mexico that was proposed in scholarly circles and is the subject of many conspiracy theories. The NAU concept does not appear to be related to either the North American Republic secessionist movement or the projected dissolution of the USA. However if you can directly source and cite the NAR to the NAU via reliable, third-party, published sources then please feel free to re-add it to the article (though preferably without all the spelling and grammar mistakes [1]). Please let me know if you have any questions or issues. Thanks, — Kralizec! (talk) 22:38, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ceciley Jenkins, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://cecileyjenkins.com/bio.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:34, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
=Copyright problems with Ceciley Jenkins==
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Ceciley Jenkins, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://cecileyjenkins.com/bio.php. As a copyright violation, Ceciley Jenkins appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Ceciley Jenkins has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Ceciley Jenkins and send an email with the message to permissions-en
wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions. - If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Ceciley Jenkins with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Ceciley Jenkins.
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Ceciley Jenkins and send an email with the message to permissions-en
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:31, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- Less text which is copied is still text which is copied. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:31, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
May 2010
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Antiedman, you may be blocked from editing. Graham87 01:06, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Graham87 06:18, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Anthony morgan peters (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello and thank you for reading my unblock request, I am Writing this Unblock request today because I am still learning WikiepediA and I had no Idea that my Edit To User: Antiedman's Talk Page was a big NoNo. Now the reason I had know Idea is because I have yet in my limited time I have yet to read any specific rules against giving Band Users Awards. I feel as though I was sent to a federal prison for life for breaking a Rule I had know Idea existed. Either way I humbly gravel before the People whom do the unblocking and say I am very very very sorry Please Forgive me for I did not know the repercussions of my last edit :<(( and I assure you I will never ever do it again. Flog me if you must but please do not sentence me to life.
Decline reason:
I don't think you're ready to go back to editing yet. — Daniel Case (talk) 14:52, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
.
Anthony morgan peters (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
First Thank you for reviewing My first appeal, The reason I am asking to be unblocked is because I have yet to read any rule/suggestion that states or implies "Giving any band user an Award constitutes vandalism" and/or "Creating a new talk page to revert a deleted talk page of a band user constitutes vandalism". Furthermore, as I have stated on this page I do fully appreciate and ask for politely full explanations of what I did wrong so as not to make the same mistake twice. Since I obviously did not receive a full explanation I did not fully understand the Policy on said accusations of said specific vandalism. Furthermore, the majority of my contributions to WikepediA have been Very constructive as you can see in my Structuring of the article Crème_caramel
Decline reason:
I think you are only playing the newbie and hoping to find a sympathetic admin who will feel sorry for you. Instead of explaining, I have some questions for you: What motivated you to start editing in the user space of a user who was kicked off of Wikipedia several months before your first edit? You did not break any specific bright line rule, but your behavior strongly indicates you are a previously blocked or banned user who is unable to let go of a chip on their shoulder. And by the way, leave the prison analogies behind, you are kicked out not locked in so the analogy doesn't hold. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:06, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Anthony morgan peters (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Answer to question asked by User Beeblebrox, My motive to giving the Band user Antiedman was because the user lived in Florida which is were Wikipedias main servers are located. As for why I put it on their user page: I truly thought that was the place you put the awards you hand out. I am extremely bewildered as to why I was blocked indefinitely and ,and as I have just recently read today, not just blocked with an exsperation date. As for my other boo boos They were all mistakes. Furthermore I have no Idea who the Wikipedia User Antiedman Actually is I was just looking through the Wiekipedians of florida and found him/her and was afraid that this user may be disgruntled so I awarded her/him a few awards to hopefully keep her/him from not doing anything rash. Please I beg of you all on my hands a knees to please let this block expire some time in the near future. I am truly remorseful for my mistakes and very sorry if I Disrespected anyone.
Decline reason:
I find your explanation strains the bounds of creulity past their toleration limit. And can you explain [[2]] this posting? --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 20:26, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
GA nominee
[edit]Hai, I have nominated the film article Loham for GA-status. Which is currently on "Hold on" time and there are some corrections to be done before it ends. Mainly copy editing for grammer and writting style. So kindly help me to make it a good article by contributing to the suggestions referred in Talk:Loham. Charles Turing (talk) 18:56, 17 October 2015 (UTC)