User talk:Anshjain2cool
Welcome
[edit]
|
January 2019
[edit]This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Yunshui 雲水 08:22, 31 January 2019 (UTC) |
Anshjain2cool (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have been blocked of sock puppetry which I never did. So, I want ask this Yunshui guy to give me some proof of it. Also, accounts like his should be blocked for claiming false acquisitions.
Decline reason:
No response for two weeks. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:37, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Do you have any connection to Dopefornerds (talk · contribs) or know who this editor is? You were both active on 26 January 2019 on the same IP address within minutes of each other. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:20, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Anshjain2cool (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I don't know who is Dopefornerds. And we were both active at a certain point of time what does it have to do with my block? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anshjain2cool (talk • contribs) 09:52, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 17:49, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
unblock discussion
[edit]Ah, perhaps much. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 22:35, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- Anshjain2cool, you have been blocked by a CheckUser for sockpuppetry (abusing multiple accounts) based on private technical evidence. While I don't have access to the technical data, what I can say is that the blocking admin saw that the two accounts had been used from the same IP within a short time. Please see this for a generic description of "technical data". Also, can a CU tell if the same device was used? JavaHurricane 08:19, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Never mind, data for the master might be stale. JavaHurricane 08:34, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- JavaHurricane, CheckUsers have access to User agent data, which, although not conclusive, can help identify if the devices (really, the browsers) were the the same or different. (If you're curious, take a look at this site to see your agent and what it says about your device/browser) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 19:00, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Never mind, data for the master might be stale. JavaHurricane 08:34, 8 May 2020 (UTC)