User talk:Anonymous20002009

August 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to List of most-followed Instagram accounts, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ℛonherry☘ 07:18, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. How is changing the word actor to actress considered “not constructive”? It’s truly not that serious. It’s a minor edit at the end of the day, so please stop making it into a major issue. Thank you. Anonymous20002009 (talk) 16:18, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of most-followed Instagram accounts. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ℛonherry☘ 14:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here’s an idea. Leave me alone and stop harassing people you don’t know on the internet. Goodbye! Anonymous20002009 (talk) 15:57, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody is "harassing" you. You are being addressed for your disruptive edits. Do not disrupt Wikipedia articles, then you would not be confronted for your disruptive edits. "Actor" is a gender-neutral term. Gomez is the most follow actor, including both men and women, not just the most followed actress. Your edits are of poor grammar and will be reverted. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia after I have performed my due diligene of informing you of this, you will be reported to Admins's Noticeboard and maybe blocked from editing Wikipedia. Regards. ℛonherry☘ 16:08, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Poor grammar? It’s one word. Actress. And that’s rich coming from you, when your grammar is also incorrect in that message you just sent. It’s “most followED” and not “most follow actor”. It’s truly never this serious, so how about you stop sending me paragraphs in regards to a single word change that I made. End of. Anonymous20002009 (talk) 16:13, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That was a typo, not an intentional disruptive edit like yours. Moreover, talk page discussions are not subject to grammatical scrutiny like article prose. Do not talk to editors here like you interact on Twitter. You are only providing me with more proof of your bad behavior when you will be reported to Admins. ℛonherry☘ 16:25, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First of all Mr Ronherry, I don’t tweet on Twitter, or should I say X. Secondly, I have done nothing wrong, never abused you, nor have I made such an offensive edit on Wikipedia, like your message implies. Once again, leave me alone or I will report you for harassment to the admins myself. You’re not the only one who knows how to use Wikipedia. Good day! Anonymous20002009 (talk) 16:47, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You indeed have done wrong by repeatedly refusing to abide WP:DISRUPTIVE. I never used the word "offensive". I used the word "disruptive", because that is what it is. Reporting me for subjective, sensationalist lies will not give you immunity from getting yourself warned and blocked by admins when I provide them with objective facts (diffs of your disruptive activity on the article and your personal attacks on me in this talk page). This is my final message to you. Regards. ℛonherry☘ 16:59, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks? Please stop insinuating that I offended you in such a cruel way when I, in fact, did not. Don’t you think you’re doing too much over a word? (Actress). And this is also my final message to you. Bye. Anonymous20002009 (talk) 17:01, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of most-followed Instagram accounts, you may be blocked from editing. ℛonherry☘ 18:03, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of most-followed Instagram accounts, you may be blocked from editing.

Good app

Good app 106.211.82.58 (talk) 08:33, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]