User talk:Ankitcktd
You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
The article Shriv ComMedia Solutions has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:48, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
January 2012
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Malware. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 10:38, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Google Chrome do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - Ahunt (talk) 17:46, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Communal violence prevention bill
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Communal violence prevention bill, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ahunt (talk) 17:52, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Customer relationship management with this edit. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Tgeairn (talk) 05:26, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Animation. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 10:05, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Please do not add any links to commediait.com to Wikipedia articles. If you believe that the site is a legitimate reference per Wikipedia's policy on reliable sources, please discuss it at the reliable sources notice board. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 10:11, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
commediait.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Consumer relationship system, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. bonadea contributions talk 10:14, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 10:31, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Ankitcktd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
because I did not seen this page before and I will be more careful for adding links on this page but I the page communal voilance boll should be started again because this is a very important and hot issue in India Ankitcktd (talk) 11:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Not just careful, you should never ever add links to sites you are associated with. The Communal violence prevention bill article you mentioned had to be deleted as a copyright violation anyway. Max Semenik (talk) 11:46, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ankitcktd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not associated with any website but I will not add with a single site and about communal violence prevention bill page I will try to getg some non copyrighted content
Decline reason:
No response to the question below for several days. Kuru (talk) 00:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Question before anyone considers unblocking: So far, Ankitcktd, it looks to me like every or nearly edit you've made to Wikipedia has been to add some form of spam link. What do you plan to do on Wikipedia if unblocked, since you are now aware that this behavior is unacceptable? Qwyrxian (talk) 05:46, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Ankitcktd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
if I wil get unblocked I will creat some new pages with out any refrance and wait others to add refrence to those pages ;I just want some important pages to be added and what you are calling SPAM , I added that just because thaught that it will help the content to remain there.
Decline reason:
That would also be inappropriate. Pages should never be created without references--such pages will almost always be immediately deleted. Pages need references to verify the information and confirm that the topics are notable. Sorry, at this point it looks like you don't sufficiently understand how Wikipedia works in order to be able to contribute. I recommend reviewing our basic policies (a good place to look is Help:Contents/Getting started), and come back in a few months. Also, I'm guessing that your native language is not English; as such, if there is a Wikipedia in your native language, you may want to consider contributing there, as it may be easier for you to get the hang of our policies there. Of course, be sure to follow their policies as well, so don't just go to another language wikipedia and start spamming.
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.