User talk:Anjooraan

Welcome!

Hello, Anjooraan, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 18:15, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Minu Kurian

Hello, Anjooraan. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Minu Kurian, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Minu Kurian to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Vanjagenije (talk) 21:39, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Najib Muhammed

A tag has been placed on Najib Muhammed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:26, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shaheed Kader

Hello Anjooraan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Shaheed Kader for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. -- L o g X 18:55, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shaheed Kader

Hello Anjooraan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Shaheed Kader for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. -- L o g X 19:33, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jaya Menon

Hello Anjooraan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jaya Menon for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Alferdomach (talk) 05:55, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Soman Baby

Hello Anjooraan,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Soman Baby, may be copied from http://www.somanbaby.com/soman_baby_profile.html. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 06:46, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Soman Baby

Hello Anjooraan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Soman Baby for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Alferdomach (talk) 07:18, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Soman baby

Hello Anjooraan,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Soman baby, may be copied from http://www.somanbaby.com/awards_and_achievements.html. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 10:09, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Soman baby

A tag has been placed on Soman baby requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from {{{value1}}}. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 10:10, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Minu Kurian

Hello, Anjooraan,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Minu Kurian should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minu Kurian .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Vanjagenije (talk) 19:17, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dyana vendetta

A tag has been placed on Dyana vendetta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. KonveyorBelt 20:20, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dayna Vendetta

A tag has been placed on Dayna Vendetta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Julie Cash

A tag has been placed on Julie Cash requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sabu Cheriyan

The article Sabu Cheriyan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Blethering Scot 19:10, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alison Tyler (Actress)

A tag has been placed on Alison Tyler (Actress) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 21:40, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Speedy Deletion

Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia.

I'm sorry, but this has been deleted as meeting one or more of the Categories for Speedy Deletion.

Generally, articles are speedily deleted when there is no assertion of significance or they fall into things to avoid or what Wikipedia is not.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written about the subject.

Sometimes articles are deleted because they contain content copyrighted elsewhere. Such content can be used as a source of information, but the content here must be completely rewritten from scratch.

Any deficiencies with notability, sourcing, or things to avoid should be remedied before reposting as they can lead to repeated deletions.

If you want to try again, consider using the Article Wizard to guide you through the creation process and use the following links to find sources.Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

CONTENT IN ARTICLES NEEDS TO BE RELIABLY SOURCED.

Please see the following links that will be helpful in editing.

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Cheers, and happy editing. Dloh cierekim 22:11, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alison Tyler (actress)

Hello Anjooraan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Alison Tyler (actress) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Porturology (talk) 08:54, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Valiya Veettil Siraj

Hello Anjooraan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Valiya Veettil Siraj for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Yankeeeye (talk) 17:15, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SOMAN BABY

Hello Anjooraan,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, SOMAN BABY, may be copied from http://www.zoominfo.com/p/Soman-Baby/909461596. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 17:34, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SOMAN BABY

A tag has been placed on SOMAN BABY requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.zoominfo.com/p/Soman-Baby/909461596. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cindy(talk) 19:05, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Valaya veettil siraj

Hello Anjooraan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Valaya veettil siraj for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Tco03displays (talk) 01:25, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Diphan

Hello Anjooraan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Diphan for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Tco03displays (talk) 05:00, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article അജിതാ ബീഗം

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page അജിതാ ബീഗം to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It currently has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 03:45, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

നമസ്കാരം, ദയവായി വിക്കീപീഡിയയുടെ ഇംഗ്ലീഷ് പതിപ്പില്‍ മലയാളം എഴുതരുത്. താങ്കളെ മലയാളം വിക്കിപീഡിയയിലേക്ക് സ്വാഗതം ചെയ്യുന്നു. നന്ദി..

Please do not contribute text in Malayalam to the English Wikipedia. Your contributions are more than welcome at the Malayalam Wikipedia. De728631 (talk) 14:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ajitha began

Hello Anjooraan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ajitha began for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Tco03displays (talk) 05:08, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anusree

The article Anusree has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ...William 17:31, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anusree

A tag has been placed on Anusree requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ...William 18:02, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anusree

The article Anusree has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dloh cierekim 04:06, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of AMBILIKUTTAN

A tag has been placed on AMBILIKUTTAN requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Alex^{discussion ★} 04:11, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ambilikuttan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ambilikuttan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ambilikuttan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shirt58 (talk) 12:36, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ambilikuttan

A tag has been placed on Ambilikuttan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Alex^{discussion ★} 20:22, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alison Tyler (actress)

The article Alison Tyler (actress) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.

IMDb is not considered a reliable source, because it is user-editable. Please check out WP:Verifiability: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source", and WP:Notability (people), particularly WP:NACTOR. JohnCD (talk) 12:51, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Umbayee

Hello Anjooraan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Umbayee for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Derekarabia (talk) 16:21, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Reshmi Boban

A tag has been placed on Reshmi Boban requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. David Biddulph (talk) 17:07, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Reshmi Boban

The article Reshmi Boban has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears unverifiable in any secondary reliable sources I can find. I checked through Google books and news archive as well as three major Indian newspapers and found not one mere mention

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:03, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SOORYA Stage and Film Society

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of SOORYA Stage and Film Society, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.sooryaindia.com/sooryaindia.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 20:20, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SOORYA Stage and Film Society

Hello Anjooraan,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, SOORYA Stage and Film Society, may be copied from http://sooryaindia.com/soorya.html. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 20:28, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dyana vendetta

A tag has been placed on Dyana vendetta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. RomeEonBmbo (Talk) 20:41, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

You must not copy material into Wikipedia. Please read WP:Copy-paste. You could write an article about Soorya that does not copy the long list of branches - simply say it has chapters in 36 countries including (a few examples). Link to its website so that a reader who wants the full list can go there. JohnCD (talk) 20:50, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Advice: slow down, and read the guidelines

You are getting a great many articles nominated for deletion, and I think you will save yourself trouble and wasted effort if you go more slowly, and take time to read some of the guidance pages. Start with WP:Your first article. Understand that the WP:Verifiability policy says: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source", and also that Wikipedia is quite choosy about subjects for articles: if an article is to be kept it needs to show the WP:Notability of its subject by giving references to "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject," see also WP:Notability (summary). In particular, just being an actor or actress is not enough to have an article - see WP:NACTOR. JohnCD (talk) 20:51, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tessa Lane

A tag has been placed on Tessa Lane requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.imdb.com/name/nm4731850/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. • Gene93k (talk) 21:04, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sindhu Biju and Mithun Ramesh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sindhu Biju and Mithun Ramesh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sindhu Biju and Mithun Ramesh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alex^{discussion ★} 12:43, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Srinda Ashab

A tag has been placed on Srinda Ashab requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. David Biddulph (talk) 12:54, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

With articles being recreated and copyright violations I've taken this to the admins

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neonchameleon (talk • contribs) 17:42, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of അജിതാ ബീഗം

The article അജിതാ ബീഗം has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-English article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 21:44, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of അജിതാ ബീഗം

A tag has been placed on അജിതാ ബീഗം requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. JohnCD (talk) 22:02, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Anjooraan/sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:Anjooraan/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.somanbaby.com/soman_baby_profile.html and http://www.somanbaby.com/awards_and_achievements.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. • Gene93k (talk) 22:07, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alison Tyler (actress) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alison Tyler (actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alison Tyler (actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Erpert ^{WHAT DO YOU WANT???} 06:26, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia may not be used as a reference

You have repeatedly tried to use Wikipedia as a reference in various articles. Please read WP:CIRCULAR for the reasons why this is not acceptable. - David Biddulph (talk) 10:04, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. . You are still doing it! You have taken no notice of any of the warnings which you have received on this or countless other topics. Your edits are without doubt disruptive. - David Biddulph (talk) 12:31, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User talk:Anjooraan. Thank you. —Erpert ^{WHAT DO YOU WANT???} 08:20, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

... as notified above at #With articles being recreated and copyright violations I've taken this to the admins. - David Biddulph (talk) 12:11, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Soman Baby

The article Soman Baby has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

One 404 & the usual heap of circular refs to Wikipedia, but no real references

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. David Biddulph (talk) 12:36, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Soman Baby

A tag has been placed on Soman Baby requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.zoominfo.com/p/Soman-Baby/909461596. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Do we have to go through this again? You already have an outstanding call to wp:ANI Neonchameleon (talk) 22:45, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I guess I can appreciate your desire, but this has to stop. You've been left countless messages above, you've violated copyright policy multiple times, most of your articles are being deleted, and you have yet to discuss anything with anyone ever. This is a collaborative project, you cannot ignore other people. I've blocked this account indefinitely until you begin to communicate and agree to understand what the problems are before you continue. --Floquenbeam (talk) 02:43, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the inconvenience happened to me....please unblock my account and I never repeat the same....sorry for again — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anjooran (talk • contribs)

Can you first explain two things? One, why have you ignored all the messages here on this page up until now? Two, please read the copyright notice above, and the page WP:Copyrights, and tell me here that you've done so. You're copying sentences, sometimes even paragraphs, from other websites. We can't do that. People will be more than happy to explain in more detail if, after reading it, you still have questions, but you first have to indicate you are going to talk to people. --Floquenbeam (talk) 13:39, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Really i am not much educated, but i am a self motivated guy, following wikipedia for one decade. i am interested to copying any thing from any other cite. but everything i recognize...pleas unlock me...let me follow the rule. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anjooraan (talk • contribs) 17:09, 12 December 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

I'm not trying to be a jerk about this, but you haven't really answered either of my two questions. I'm very happy you are highly motivated and that you love Wikipedia, but this can't go on. You cannot copy things from other sites. I really need more than "let me follow the rule". --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:37, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Only SOMAN BABY's profile was happened such mistakes. Early my attempt was clear and authentic. i didn't ignore the messages. It was mistaken what i didn't aware and understanding well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anjooraan (talk • contribs) 09:08, 13 December 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

Floquenbeam, I understand your concern about my posts. Honestly, I have spent much time on Wikipedia, but I'm new to development, or posting articles. I was unaware about the team effort and collaboration that goes into building Wikipedia page, nor was I aware that I had many messages pending.

I will make sure to take this serious, and respond and work with everyone needed in posting on the site. I didn't think that the plagiarism was a serious issue, and will not let that happen again.

If you would please unblock me, that would be great.

thanks

Deletion discussion about Diphan

Hello, Anjooraan,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Diphan should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diphan .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Vanjagenije (talk) 11:28, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

sir, can you unblock me to create and edit . so far i created a lot of valid profiles — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anjooraan (talk • contribs) 08:49, 30 December 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Bahrain Kerala Samajam

A tag has been placed on The Bahrain Kerala Samajam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Shirt58 (talk) 11:19, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jaya Menon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jaya Menon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaya Menon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jupitus Smart 09:11, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Valiyaveetil films International

The article Valiyaveetil films International has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let There Be Sunshine (talk) 17:45, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Siddique Shameer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siddique Shameer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siddique Shameer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 07:08, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]