User talk:Anja Muckenfuß

This is Anja Muckenfuß's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Claudia Peus (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources are mostly close primary ones, plus a couple of pieces where the subject is commenting on something, and therefore none of these contribute to notability per WP:GNG. If special WP:NACADEMIC notability is being asserted, please specify clearly which of the criteria 1-8 is met, and what evidence supports this.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Claudia Peus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:44, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anja Muckenfuß! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:44, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the help and support! I will review the article asap and add additional references as requested. Anja Muckenfuß (talk) 11:34, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Anja Muckenfuß. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Claudia Peus, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:46, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Claudia Peus has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Claudia Peus. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:48, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your valuable feedback. I worked on all your recommendations and resubmited the article yesterday. Anja Muckenfuß (talk) 10:42, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hi Anja Muckenfuß! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:19, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for telling me, I was not aware of this - thought it is not relevant as the page was not published yet and I thought I worked in a draft. Will consider that in the future! Anja Muckenfuß (talk) 10:41, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Claudia Peus has been accepted

Claudia Peus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 06:57, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the kind works and the support! I am very happy that the article has been created! Anja Muckenfuß (talk) 20:57, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]