Jump to content

User talk:AnitaClark

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anita Clark Realtor LLC, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:58, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Anita Clark Realtor LLC (August 22)

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Anita Clark Realtor LLC, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anita Clark Realtor LLC (January 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
/wiae /tlk 04:04, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! AnitaClark, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wiae /tlk 04:04, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Favonian (talk) 11:29, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AnitaClark (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have no idea why I was banned? I linked to relevant (and not found elsewhere) information about my communities. How do I get the edit ban removed? AnitaClark (talk) 22:56, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Do you have any interest in doing anything other than promoting your real estate business? --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 01:31, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AnitaClark (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Yes, but I have not been given the opportunity to do that since I was banned. Please lift the ban so I can prove my worth to the Wikipedia community. AnitaClark (talk) 22:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, based on your responses below I must decline your request. Your edits prior to the block consisted of you posting links to what you call a "real estate and community information blog". Your post below that you want to post "a lot of significant events and places that are not captured anywhere else" suggests to me you will only continue promotional activity if unblocked. Please read WP:PROMO, WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:5P. There are appropriate forums to do what you want to do, this isn't it. I will, however, post below a procedure you can undertake to actually demonstrate an edit that you want to make. If you want to do that, then do so and make a new unblock request. 331dot (talk) 00:07, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thank you for getting back to me so quickly 331dot! I want to post about all the fun things to do in my community that are not posted anywhere else. AnitaClark (talk) 23:16, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Only one request is needed at a time. Subsequent comments do not need to be formatted as unblock requests. What exactly does that mean? This is not a forum to merely give information. 331dot (talk) 23:31, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dot331...it means we have a lot of significant events and places that are not captured anywhere else. I am not trying to game the system. I am sure my account will be followed, checked, verified, etc. I can imagine anything not worthy will get my account banned (again). I am just asking for a chance.

I will abide by and follow the guidelines, and make the edits/updates as requested to get reinstated but I do take exception to your comment that suggests I will continue to post promotion information. I never said I would do that, did not infer that was my intention, and in fact I would not. BTW...some of the information on that real estate blog you reference is among the best on the web (i.e. drones, new construction, historic homes, little houses, the communities in middle Georgia, etc.) for the topics presented. It/I was never given a chance because it was a work related blog.— Preceding unsigned comment added by AnitaClark (talkcontribs)

I do not mean to give offense, but as an administrator I(or, should you make another request, another administrator) must be convinced that unblocking you will benefit the project in some way, and part of that is knowing exactly what you intend to do and that you understand at least on a basic level Wikipedia policies related to what you want to do. I was not convinced; I can only call things as I see them. I hope that you are able to demonstrate understanding and that you will make valid contributions. I will add that blogs are not generally considered reliable sources as they usually lack editorial control and review. If the blog is your work's, as seems to be the case, it is not an independent source. I again urge you to review the policies I linked to in my decline of your unblock request. 331dot (talk) 00:36, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do appreciate that not all of my past contributions have been deleted such as #13 here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Warner_Robins,_Georgia

Your draft article, Draft:Anita Clark Realtor LLC

[edit]

Hello, AnitaClark. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Anita Clark Realtor LLC".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. — Sam Sailor 22:24, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Second chance

[edit]

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

  • Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
  • Read our guide to improving articles
  • Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
  • If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
    1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
    2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
      • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
      • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
      • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
      • do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
    3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
    4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
    5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Save.
  • Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
  • When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
    • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 00:08, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]