Jump to content

User talk:Animum/Archives/2007/December

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Asal Uttar

The new text added was unreferenced, and is factually incorrect in anycase. Previously every assertion made in the article was supported, and this is again the case as I have changed it back.

Thank You regards

Spiritual Baptist

In your eyes, as one of the members of the Baptist work group, should this article be included in the scope of the project, and/or any baptist related categories, or not? Please response at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity/Anabaptist work group#Spiritual Baptist. Thank you. John Carter 22:01, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

The Waylon Jennings vandal

I've blocked User:142.68.206.30 for a week, and semi-protected Waylon Jennings for a month, since there are a couple of other IPs associated with vandalism of that page. Maybe they'll get distracted by a butterfly during that time. Joyous! | Talk 00:35, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

...ooo shiny... Thanks for the protections/blocks, by the way. —Animum (talk) 00:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Dark Barnstar of Reversion
For dealing with vandalism on your userpage and usertalk page and always standing up to vandals I User Swirlex award you this Dark Barnstar of Reversion, you really deserve it.
:-D —Animum § 16:21, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

NASCAR Fan24's Secret Page!

The Secret Page Detective Award
This user has found NASCAR Fan24's hidden page! Congratulations!

You are officially the fifth admin to find my secret page! Congrats! NF24(radio me!) 17:40, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

w00t! —Animum § 17:43, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Vampire Warrior

Already dealt with & archived. If you don't mind I'll remove your entry on WP:ANI--Rodhullandemu (please reply here - contribs) 21:12, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

I've already done a rollback on my edits; I searched the document for the text "vampire warrior", but as the discussion was hidden, it returned nothing, so I posted. Anyway, I'm glad to hear it's been resolved. —Animum § 21:19, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom

Given the guidelines set forth, you should probably move this comment to the talk page. - Rjd0060 01:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, it appeared I royally messed up when making that comment; I've decided to abstain. —Animum § 01:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Given that I'm the "jackass", I am confused as to why anybody wou.....never mind. I'll keep all the politics to myslef. Just thought I'd let you know about the "long" comment before a million other people did. - Rjd0060 01:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
I was neither aware of the WP:VPP incident at the time I cast my vote nor of the discouragement of "long" vote rationale. Best regards, —Animum § 01:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
No problem. It is kind of explained here and I noticed a user went around adding notices to the top of every page. - Rjd0060 02:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

vandalism question

This user is doing the same exact edits as this blocked user if the first is acting as a sock puppet, can they be blocked right away, or not? Ctjf83 02:20, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

I'd say so. —Animum § 02:37, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Hey Animum, Can I be a moderator? or do you have to do something special? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Heyitsbo2 (talk • contribs) 02:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you mean... —Animum § 02:37, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
you said "I'd say so" to my question...r u sayin they are SPs or that they can be blocked right away Ctjf83 02:54, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
checkY Blocked —Animum § 15:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

hey, this user is using more puppets User talk:121.221.177.213, User talk:124.182.8.134 User talk:60.230.193.165 are all doing the same vand. edits, can you block all 3 for a longer period than a few days? Ctjf83 09:28, 4 December 2007 (UTC) Is this possible, or do you have to wait for vandalism agian? Ctjf83 talk 01:51, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm a bit busy at the moment; mind posting a report to AIV? —Animum § 01:56, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

User:R/EFD

Someone deleted it again. They said it was an attack page. I saw how you kept deleting and restoring it just for fun, but I was hoping you might come through in the clutch. Reply on my talk page. Best, --Gp75motorsports (talk) 23:42, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

P.S. Sorry for the redlink. I was trying to give you a shortcut to the page.

In all interests of accuracy, I was deleting the page to purge it of somewhat disturbing comments. Regards, —Animum § 01:06, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Ohh. I get it now. Sorry if it came off as an insult. --Gp75motorsports (talk) 01:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Not at all, not at all. :-) —Animum § 23:40, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

You got mail

From me regarding important matters. PrestonH 04:18, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

I've replied accordingly to the e-mail and taken the necessary measures to correct the problem. —Animum § 23:41, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

This is not vandalism. The IP was removing libelous information concerning a BLP. Miranda 00:50, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

You're absolutely right. That's what you get for RC-patrolling too quickly. Apologies, —Animum § 00:52, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Randomquote

Do you have a similar template that does not display the "show another" field? « ₣ullMetal ₣alcon » 02:32, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

With the parameter "hidepurge", which I just added, you can use {{randomquote|hidepurge=yes}} to hide the purge link. Regards, —Animum § 02:34, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

The Clown (album)

I'm wondering if this shouldn't be moved back to The Clown, since clearly the character from Camp Blood is not a significant enough usage of "The Clown" to warrant even a disambiguation page. Wareh (talk) 18:54, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

I've added a simple note to the top of the page (in case anyone gets redirected there from The Clown) to see Camp Blood for the movie character. Regards, —Animum (talk) 19:00, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Christmas

May your days be merry and bright, and may all your Christmasses be serious beak bustin! I'll bust your beak! (time for some beak bustin'!) 01:58, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Affirmative, sir. May yours be equally filled with beak busting. :-D —Animum (talk) 01:59, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

question

hello, Animum! I have seen the box "A Status Bot says I am: Online" at your userpage... I would like something like that, too... So I added Category:Wikipedians who use StatusBot to my userpage. But what have I to do now? Could you help me? That would be very nice. Best regards, —αἰτίας •discussion• 18:00, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Just add {{User:StatusBot/Template}} to your userpage. :-) Regards, —Animum (talk) 18:04, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello, thanks, done. I have another qestion: How does the bot know wether I'm off, or on? Can I configurate that in any way? Regards, —αἰτίας •discussion• 18:12, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
I'm not entirely sure about this one, but I think it tracks your edits and if your most recent one was made recently, the marks you as online. —Animum (talk) 18:14, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Okay. Thanks a lot. —αἰτίας •discussion• 18:23, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Any time. —Animum (talk) 18:24, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Count

Does your count.js work? Because I don't get anything... is a new tab supposed to appear near watch etc. with the name 'edit count'? -- Mentifisto 09:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

You should see a new link in the toolbox saying "Edit count" when viewing user, user talk, or contribution pages. Regards, —Animum § 01:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
I don't see anything. :-/ -- Mentifisto 22:47, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
It should work now. —Animum (talk) 01:29, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Ermmmm, Animum dear, would you mind rolling it back? lol. For some reason, when you changed it to open in a new tab, now it isn't using Kate's, it is using mediawiki or something. Odd. Sorry! Ariel♥Gold 06:44, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Sure thing; I just like query.php because it's so much faster. :-D —Animum (talk) 15:16, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, it works now... what was wrong though? And about query.php... it is fast but is it normal for it to remain unformatted? And, well, for me now wannabe kate is displaying a 403 error when I click the edit count link (and any other link it seems today). -- Mentifisto 20:18, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
The toolserver has crashed again. >:-| I'll keep it as query.php (it's supposed to remain unformatted unless you specify a format in the url [i.e., "&format=txt"]). —Animum (talk) 20:33, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Oh yeah, I forgot to read the doc in the link it provides, and thanks for that indentation information, I was just recently wondering about that... so, thanks for everything, that edit count link is useful. -- Mentifisto 20:48, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Any time. —Animum (talk) 20:55, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Ariel not understand code speek! :D So, I guess I will just ask, how come at first, it was using Kate's, then, it was using the link above, and now, it is using something totally different, that's neither one? Am I doing something wrong? How can I get it to go back to Kate's, lol. Ariel♥Gold 21:17, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Animum not surprised. :-D :-P All jokes aside, the toolserver has broken again, so it's back to query.php for the most part. The link above is a differently-formatted version of the default query.php output in a more easily readable (in my opinion, at least) format. If you really want to use the wannabe_kate tool, however, replace importScript("User:Animum/count.js") with the following.
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="'
        + 'http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User:Animum/count.js'
        + '&oldid=176853947&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"></script>');

—Animum (talk) 21:30, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

What's it mean, "toolserver has broken"? Don't a lot of bots run from the toolserver? I realize that Kate's sometimes goes down for short periods of time, but it is normally back up within a few hours, right? Is Kate's running from toolserver? What happens to bots that are running from there, if toolserver goes boom? lol. Yeah I guess I could hop on IRC and ask you these silly questions instead of filling up your talk page, but I actually have to do some non-wiki "work" (~*gasp*~) today, and if I go on IRC I'll never leave, lol. Anyway, thanks for telling me how to change it. I guess it is really no biggie, you're right, the other one is way faster, and I do have a link to Kate's in my cheetsheet subpage, so no big deal. ~*Grin*~ Ariel♥Gold 21:40, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
I think some of the bots on the toolserver can be run locally (i.e., from the bot owner's computer) in the case that it malfunctions, but some IRC bots (such as MiszaBot, which runs from only the toolserver) have been broken for some time now. Yes, the wannabe_kate tool is run from the toolserver. And no, I don't mind at all if you ask your questions here. —Animum (talk) 21:54, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you ...

...for reverting vandalism on my user page. Jackaranga (talk) 20:25, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

No problem! —Animum (talk) 23:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi Animum, I'm new to the wikipedia world and I'd like to write about a company in San Francisco that does some really cool work in employee engagement. My original page was deleted for not being "notable", though I hardly had enough time to site secondary sources etc. What do you recommend I do to make the material more suited for the wikipedia community? Thanks! ~carlydow —Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlydow (talk • contribs) 00:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

The Rights of Man

I deleted the United States Declaration from Thomas Paine's The Rights of Man, under the Conception section. The Declaration was written 15 years prior and Paine's Rights of Man did not influence it, nor did the Declaration directly influence Rights of Man. It was mostly Locke's Second Treatise. Taishaku

checkY Reverted my changes. —Animum (talk) 23:34, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Sandbox Reset JS

Hi Animum, I was just wondering if there was a way to make it so that your Sandbox Reset Script would automatically uncheck the watch this page button like how it checks the minor edit button.--Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions) 01:51, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

I never noticed that button, which would explain why my watchlist page is so d**ned long! :-P I'll get to work promptly. —Animum (talk) 01:55, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. I prefer not to watch the sandbox, as it clogs up my watchlist, so I found it annoying that the script always adds it to the list (because of my preferences). This makes reseting easier.--Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions) 23:21, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey, didn't you used to be name "Magnus Animum"?--Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions) 23:30, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Yeah. —Animum (talk) 23:35, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Please use the talk page

Please use the pages talk page before undoing my edits. Its kinda annoying, when info not needed is being kept on an already insignificant page. 74.14.147.245 (talk) 00:27, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Health issues eh

Honey
Tea

Do get better soon! KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 13:24, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

I hope it's not my cold you caught, and that you are feeling better very soon. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 16:10, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Hurry up and get better so that I have someone to race while on RC patrol. :) *Cremepuff222* 21:50, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

You have KOS. It's a sore throat by the way, but nowhere nearly as bad as Strep. —Animum (talk) 22:10, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Oh that's good. You won't have to change your name to Streptrip. *Cremepuff222* 22:47, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Touché. —Animum (talk) 22:51, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Best place for you is off the computer ;) GET BETTER SOON ANIMUM! Redrocketboy 00:58, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

I've been going to bed earlier this week due to my health issues (which also explain why I wasn't on IRC at all yesterday ;-)). BEST REGARDS FROM YOUR FRIEND WHOSE CAPS KEY IS STUCK, —Animum (talk) 01:00, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Conchita Espinosa

I was wondering if you'd consider withdrawing your nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conchita Espinosa. It appears additional sources were found and I've done some rewriting on the article. The AfD seems destined for a keep, and withdrawing the nomination would allow it to be closed early. Thanks for your consideration & Merry Christmas! --Ssbohio (talk) 04:18, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Invader Zim

I believe your move of the article Invader Zim to Invader ZIM completely goes against what this naming convention says (especially since this article is specifically mentioned on this section as the article title being moved to Invader Zim.) All I see is editors on the talk page saying to ignore our core guidelines, not consensus as you stated. — Save_Us_229 22:19, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

I've moved the article back to Zim since I wasn't aware that the guideline did not encourage exceptions. Regards, —Animum (talk) 00:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Your edit to my userpage

Thanks for your edit to my userpage. I was trying to get the indentation in the new section to line up with that of the old one, but didn't succeed and finally gave up, so I appreciate your attention to the matter. I see, though, that your edit changed the text portions of the top two sections from left-justified to centered. Was that intentional, and do you think it looks better that way? I'll trust your judgment on this crucial issue. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:06, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

My judgement is ... *Drum roll* text-align:left. —Animum (talk) 00:38, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Hello!

Sure adopt me! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lickthesocket (talk • contribs) 02:55, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Marlith T/C 04:24, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Copy editing request

Dear Animum,

I recently requested a copy edit from the League of Copy Editors and noticed that your name is included on the list of members. At this writing, Jimmy McAleer, a B-class biography of an old-time American baseball figure, is in the peer review process. So far, all reviewers have suggested that the article is ready to send to the GAC. A couple of them recommended that I send it straight to the FAC. Before considering the latter, I would like to ensure that the article is as clean as possible. I'd greatly appreciate any time you're able to devote to it. Season's greetings, -- twelsht (talk) 15:14, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

hi!

I was browsing trough the list of potential adopters and i landed on you! can you adopt me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SpanxBox (talk • contribs) 19:31, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

semi-protection

Hi Animum!
Could you do me a favour and semi-protect my user-page? It has not been vandalized yet and I would like to leave it "un-vandalized". ;-)
Thanks for your support
--Fromgermany (talk) 20:41, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

checkY Done —Animum (talk) 20:43, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, but, hey, it's not my fault I was born in this problem/angst-ridden country in central Europe. ;-) Ever been to Germany? Not much fun there, I can tell you. And de.wikipedia is absolutely "nightmarish" --Fromgermany (talk) 20:46, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
I've always wanted to go to Germany, actually, but I hardly edit dewiki. I'm from the USA and please don't tell me you want to go to this problem-ridden country. ;-) —Animum (talk) 20:48, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Well, all I can advise is - stay away from de.wikipedia. Most articles there are unsourced, most sysops like to do "user-bashing" and the overall tone of voice leaves a lot to be desired. :-(( I've given up editing there com-ple-te-ly. I very much prefer the Anglo-Saxons. You people are very friendly, even when you're online, yeeeeeeeaaaaaaah. --Fromgermany (talk) 20:53, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
I'm not Anglo-Saxon, but okay. —Animum (talk) 20:57, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

A warm welcome

Thaaaaaaaaaanks for your welcoming words but I arrived here in 2005. It was only recently that I decided to do more frequent/regular/daily edits when I decided that de.wikipedia is nothing but a pile of shit. (Oops, sorry for using such bad language, but it's true) I still like the "wiki-philosophy" nevertheless so I set up my new and permanent home at a wiki-place I had explored before. Oh, and by the way, in Europe we're taught (at school as well as at our universities) that the Americans also belong to the Anglo-Saxon "tribe". All native speakers of English are labelled Anglo-Saxon. Incredible, isn't it?? ;-) --Fromgermany (talk) 21:25, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Indeed. :-) —Animum (talk) 21:26, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
But don't worry. Your British, Australian, Canadian and even Irish brothers and sisters don't bite. Let's not forget the lot from New Zealand. Funny accent but peaceful human beings inside. --Fromgermany (talk) 21:32, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
True, just like the Brits and Aussies. ;-) —Animum (talk) 21:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Adoption

Would you like to adopt me?

Because i would Very Much like it if you adopted me...

xxx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kristineinyourface (talk • contribs) 22:46, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Boo

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make destructive contributions to Nupedia, at least one of your not-recent edits, such as the one you made to User:Animum, did not appear to be destructive and has been reverted or removed. Please do not use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and use the welcome page at the stake to learn more about doing something to this encyclopedia. Thedjatclubrock :) (T/C) 03:13, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

You stole my inside IRC joke! —Animum (talk) 03:16, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

How did i vandalize

I was talking to him about an edit? How is that vandalism? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.172.31.84 (talk) 03:54, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, the header text threw me off. —Animum (talk) 03:59, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Your X-mas gift

Wikipedia Trading Cards!
Collect them all!
Name: PrestonH
Personality: Nice, welcoming, impatient
Experience: 5 stars (see stars above)
Hit Points (HP): 8800/8800
Abilities: Vandal fighting, Wiki-gnoming,
being nice
Weaknesses: Sourcing, conflict resolution,
copyediting, image handling
Signature: PrestonH
----------------------------------------------------
Have fun trading!

The Christmas gift you will recieve this year from me is this trading card. I hand crafted it which took over an hour at previewing the sandbox to make it look real. Not really shiny, but you get the idea of giving, right? And to top it all off, I would like to give you some chocolate bars for Christmas for you to enjoy...

...well, I'm all out of thoughts for your presents. It's the thought that counts. Anyways, Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! PrestonH 06:58, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

/me huggles PrestonH. —Animum (talk) 15:43, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Happy holidays

Happy Holidays

Happy seasons' greetings (as you say in the US of A)

Heloooo, dear Animum!
Even though we have only just met here, I'd like to send you a nice little Xmas gift, i.e. a Christmas tree trimmed "the German style". But I admit, this one is with a rather meagre/meager trimming. Usually we Central Europeans throw all decoration items we have into the tree. You were very helpful so I think I'll appoint you my favourite (ah, bloody BRITISH English again!!!!!!) okay, okay, my favorite sysop in 2008. ;-) ;-)
--Fromgermany (talk) 08:58, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you! —Animum (talk) 17:39, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

You've been loved by BK4ME

Hey there! BK4ME has loved you by placing a heart icon in the top-right corner of your userpage. Don't worry, it's not vandalism, but simply a small way to spread the WikiLove. If you don't really like it, feel free to revert it and make it go away, and no hard feelings; after all, it's just a small token of appreciation. If you like it, just add your name here, but again, there's no need to feel upset if you don't. Love and best wishes, —BK4ME 17:28, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

For this. :) Acalamari 22:17, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

No problem. ;-) —Animum (talk) 22:32, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

CHris Stokes Page

You reported my changing the chris stokes page as vandalism, Obviously you didn't read what i changed the page started with die faggot die and then made numerous allegations of pedophilia against the subject. Could you at least read the stuff before you confirm what the bot turned up. I can't understand how to report it as a false positive. But it kind of pisses me off that my talk page has this report and all i was trying to do was the right thing. I have only made a few changes ever on wikipedia and always when it is a blatant error. Help me out. I did not vandalize the page. You reverted the page back to serious vandalism along with libelous claims.

thanks

dk — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.57.255.153 (talk)

Discuss it on the talk page or remove the defamatory/libelous content; this is not the proper way of fixing the article. —Animum (talk) 17:13, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.57.255.153 (talk)

chris stokes page

The article does not have any sources and the information is not correct. It DOES need deleted. Read the article. I can't believe I even have to type this. Ridiculous.

dk

checkY – WP:BLP problems removed. —Animum (talk) 17:29, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
The same allegations were put back in the article again today, unsourced and in violation of BLP. We will have to keep an eye on this article and consider increasing the protection if the problem continues. Newyorkbrad (talk) 21:17, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

kitty foiled?

that is INSANE! i've improved a bunch of other cartoons, and this is the only one you complain about? 64.91.201.195 (talk) 21:06, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

My apologies. I only saw the topmost bit of the diff and thought you removed content from the article without replacing it. —Animum (talk) 21:20, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

why did you

revert my edit? I am being serious. 86.148.190.169 (talk) 21:32, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

ps: its not meant to be funny. 86.148.190.169 (talk) 21:39, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

This edit? Oh, I don't know… —Animum (talk) 02:26, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh noes!! « ₣ullMetal ₣alcon » 21:44, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Dum dum dummmmmm! —Animum (talk) 02:26, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Edit counter

Hi Animum, I think you could use this edit counter in your count.js script. It's just as fast and accurate and it gives you just what you want - an edit count. -- Mentifisto 15:14, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings

Wishing you the very best for the season - but with this full bag! -- Cat chi? 19:17, 25 December 2007 (UTC)


Oh my, I never would have expected Wikipe-tan was Santa! Who are her elfen helpers!? —Animum (talk) 19:19, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
 Merry Christmas, Animum/Archives/2007/December! Wishing you a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year!

Best regards from myself! Post this merry message on any other user talk page you can find.
-- S♦s♦e♦b♦a♦l♦l♦o♦s (Merry Christmas!)

You tagged me

You recently tagged me with:

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Animum

What is this about? I've been on Wikipedia for a long time and have never had a problem. Over that time, I've been a major advocate of Wiki policies and often police for vandalism, original research and other inappropriate material. I haven't created that many articles and none of them have been controversial or had suspect notability. Please explain what this is about. Thanks. ask123 (talk) 20:25, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

You were warned for creating User:Leet and User:I4m3L33t with the content of "Yo". —Animum (talk) 20:29, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my page. --Nlu (talk) 18:18, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

No problem. —Animum (talk) 18:19, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

Your page got vandalized. [1] *Cremepuff222* 02:57, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Distracting me, eh!? —Animum (talk) 03:00, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Dear Animum/Archives/2007, here is a little note to say thank you for your kind support on my request for adminship which succeeded with a final result of (72/19/6).

Now that I am a sysop, do not hesitate to contact me with any queries you have. I would be glad to help you along with the other group of kind and helpful administrators.

Thank you again and I look forward to editing alongside you in the future. — E talk 12:24, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Christian Conventions

I would appreciate you having a look again at this page. In particular here. Talk:Christian_Conventions#External_Links

The user (trv6983) has an axe to grind against the church (I am a member). He's convinced we are a cult, and is trying to re-edit the page to this effect. I have simply used a strategy of removing his edits as they reference self-published material by himself and others. He has also also recently added pages which slander living persons. At least he is talking on the Discussion page.

But in a word, the guy is being silly. In this section you will see how he is making up his own 'wiki' policies. I don't know if I should request he be blocked, but I'm not going to continue being able to manage this guy by myself. I think there may be an intelligence or other issue since I don't think we're really engaging one another in conversation. I really just want someone to back me up at this point. (Or, if I am wrong and I'm pretty sure I'm not, let me know). Slofstra (talk) 06:26, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

About the O RLY Owl thread

Well, I may not be the best at writing constructive passages when I'm under the heavy stress of school work, but what I am good at is noticing when things are necessary for updates. I learned recently of that fact and I figured I would spread the word and update the page since it is such crucial information on the topic.

I would be pleased to find that information in some way to be contributed so that viewers could know that such a well known internet icon is dead. I was upset that I did not know about it at first. Thank you in advance if this can be done.

-SolidShakes, a happy Wikipedia user for quite a while now —Preceding unsigned comment added by SolidShakes (talk • contribs) 02:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Hey, SolidShakes! I actually wasn't aware there was a such thing as an O RLY? owl, so as soon as you find a source verifying the owl has died, feel absolutely free to reinsert the material with the reference added. Best regards, —Animum (talk) 02:50, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Heya

Ye im the guy who vandalised the recent additions thing, but i did it deliberately to see how quickly recent changes patrollers reverted unconstructive edits to the site. Great speed, anyway thanks, I wont do it again, just good to know that you guys are swift. Sorry, though --Hadseys (talk • contribs) 03:54, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes, some of us RC patrollers are very speedy. I'm sure and glad that you won't do it again. Feel free to delete the warning from your talk page. Best regards, —Animum (talk) 03:57, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: deletion of 'Fake Identification'

Dear Animum,

I am writing to request clarification as to why you deleted my entry on 'Fake Identificaqtion'. It was tagged for speedy deletion by the user uzze indicating that it was a band, person, etc. I'd like to clarify that Fake Identification is not a band, it's an art and design duo that live in Los Angeles and are famous for the experimenatal publications they produce. I personally studied under one of the members of Fake Identification (professor Joshua Trees) at Art Center College of Design. What steps should I to republish my entry and to avoid deletion

Thanks

Natsuo

DYK

Updated DYK query On 30 December, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ramesseum medical papyri, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Wizardman 19:38, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

A request for your consideration regarding CAT:AOTR

The guinea pigs having said this is good enough, I'm working my way through the A's ++Lar: t/c 21:42, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Sandbox reset

Good evening: I was wondering how your sandbox reset script was created. This may sound weird but I'm very interestd in learning JS C HTML and other coding languages. So far I know little HTML...So I was just wondering if you could tell me how you made it. Thank you! --GalaxyGuy (talk) 00:43, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Happy new year






Hi, Animum. I wish you a successful, healthy, peaceful and happy new year. :) On this occasion I would like to thank you for your nice help in the IRC, too. Best wishes from —αἰτίας





Thanks! —Animum (talk) 02:49, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

I made something contructive there. \

I made something contructive there. Look at it again and if you want, improve it without being racist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Velanthis (talk • contribs) 19:04, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Animum/Archives/2007/December&oldid=1160096377"