User talk:Animum/Archives/2007/August
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
BankingMyWay article post
Hello!
I am writing regarding the posting for BankingMyWay. Since you did not feel that there was anything notable about the article, I was wondering if we could compromise. What if I wrote an article that informed readers about how to use different financial resources on the Internet and then included several links to sites (such as BankingMyWay) that could be used as free resources to find the information? I thought that the search term for the encyclopedia could be "financial resources" or something comparable. Would you mind sharing your thoughts about this?
Thank you for your time!
Laura Lawrence Laural10 llawrence@bankingmyway.com
Personal attack and slander from Nathansummers
Several weeks ago I emailed you about the site "Rocky Radio" and the personal attacks and slander the website owner was using against me in an attempt to harass me (this was in regards to an inappropriate external link). I reported this person to Myspace" for copy right infringment for stealing both my copyrighted blog and their logo and format from there site. The person has now shown up on the Rocky Horror Picture show talk page and begun attacking me there. I would like to hope that admin takes this seriously. I have also left a message on ANI, but contact you as I had previously mentioned this problem a while back. Please help if you can. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amadscientist (talk • contribs)
- Thank you sir. I was so upset I forgot to sign. --Amadscientist 01:30, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- Per Wikipedia policy on removing personal attacks I have deleted Nathan Summers comments on the Rocky Horror Picture Show Talk page. While this is a controversial way of dealing with an issue I believe I was within my rights. Atropos re-added them which in turn I deleted once more, but am asking for technical help to permanently delete a libelous personal attack that gives personal off site information. Your help would be greatly appreciated.--Amadscientist 01:01, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you sir.--Amadscientist 01:20, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- Per Wikipedia policy on removing personal attacks I have deleted Nathan Summers comments on the Rocky Horror Picture Show Talk page. While this is a controversial way of dealing with an issue I believe I was within my rights. Atropos re-added them which in turn I deleted once more, but am asking for technical help to permanently delete a libelous personal attack that gives personal off site information. Your help would be greatly appreciated.--Amadscientist 01:01, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
SummerSlam 2007
Thanks for the lock, however a vandal added the second match, which has not been announced, just before you locked it [1], could you revert this edit please. Darrenhusted 18:03, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Reversion of Four to Score (novel)
I saw you reverted the edits by 64.180.205.246. I restored them, as they seemed to be worthy contributions (spelling, expansion, and tone). Kweeket 22:09, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
SummerSlam 2007
I would like to request the unprotection under the ground for people who make constructive edits.--Hornetman16 (talk) 06:55, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- When does the protection expire?--Hornetman16 (talk) 19:16, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Animum Delivery Bot
Can I ask you to deliver a newsletter, just once, for WikiProject Ice Hockey? It is located at Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Newsletter, and the delivery list is at Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Newsletter/List, please? It would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! --Maxim 18:15, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- It's neither one, really. It's a general update. We (the Project) don't really know when is going to be the next newsletter, as this was created because of pure necessity. You can call "Newsletter 1" or any variation of that. I doesn't really matter.
Also, I forgot to take vanished and retired users off the inactive list, so I'll drop a line in five minutes when I'm done (it should be really quick). Cheers! Maxim 18:40, 2 August 2007 (UTC)Never mind, I doesn't really matter; after all, they might as well come back. Maxim 18:43, 2 August 2007 (UTC)- You can continue the bot, it's not a big worry, and if need be, I'll delete the bad links afterwards, as there is only about 10 users out of 100+ in that category. Thanks!! Maxim 18:45, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot!!!!! Maxim 19:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- You can continue the bot, it's not a big worry, and if need be, I'll delete the bad links afterwards, as there is only about 10 users out of 100+ in that category. Thanks!! Maxim 18:45, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Ice Hockey August 2007 Newsletter
WikiProject Ice Hockey Newsletter Dear Animum/Archives/2007/August! You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up as a member of WikiProject Ice Hockey. The purpose of this newsletter is to update on the goings on of the project, as there have been major changes, and a lot of new recognized content in the past few weeks. If you are an inactive user, you probably won't recognize the new and improved state of the WikiProject! From the project, Maxim. New recognized content By Maxim
Article Improvement By Maxim Upon some discussion on the WikiProject talk page, the Article Improvement Drive page was revamped by Krm500 and Maxim. It was renamed Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Article Improvement, and it includes two section. The first section is called articles in dire need of improvement. It list articles, usually important, that are in very poor shape. The second section is called requested help. Users list an article they request help improving a certain article, which will facilitate collaboration, which is the aim of any WikiProject. There is one article currently listed there, Henrik Lundqvist, here. The goal is to at least get it to Good article status. Diacritics By Maxim In the past few weeks, there has been quite heated discussion about the use of diacritics in article name. The current guideline is using diacritics in the pages of articles of all player names which require them, but redirects are exempt. Task forces By Maxim This task force was initiated by Krm500. Its current goal is to improve Henrik Lundqvist to Good or Featured article status. It covers all Swedish clubs, leagues and competitions and associated articles, players and coaches that are Swedish, or have played/coached for a Swedish club, and arenas in Sweden. They plan to eventually operate as a sort of a sub-project, which will have its own articles for creation, ranking importance and quality of articles, and co-ordinate article improvement. Its current members are Krm500, Bamsefar75, and CLAES. This task force was initiated by Bsroiaadn. Its goal is to improve New Jersey Devils to Featured Topic status. Although it currently meets the required article count, the task force wishes to improve it further. Its area of coverage is very similar to the Sweden Ice Hockey task force. Its members are Bsroiaadn, JHMM13, FutureNJGov, Sportskido8, Michael Greiner, JRWalko, and Soxrock. Requested Images By Maxim
Article assessement completed By Maxim |
This is a courtesy copy for you own pleasure. Enjoy! :) Maxim 19:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
I discovered a page I created that may need to be deleted
While editing "The Rocky Horror Picture Show" article some time ago I was linking characters to pages that had previously been created. I did not locate a page for one character so I created one. I turns out I was was spelling the name the same way as the character page had it, which was Frank-N-Furter. I created the page Frank N. Furter. However all Rocky Horror Characters have had thier pages deleted (for some reason) except for this one and the page Usherette Trixie. Please look into whether these pages should exist or be deleted. If they are ok to stay can I re-create other pages for other characters.--Amadscientist 05:10, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello Magnus animum, as you were the protecting administrator, I thought you may want to know that I changed the protection level of SummerSlam 2007 from edit=sysop move=sysop to edit=autoconfirmed move=sysop due to an RFPP request. Good edits were wanting to be done to the article. If you disagree with my decision feel free to re-instate full protection. Acalamari 01:47, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Gasp!
I can't believe it ;-) ! ~ Wikihermit 20:22, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for playing
![]() |
The Excellent Userpage Award | |
You were a finalist of the Best User Page Contest! Congratulations! Marlith T/C 03:43, 7 August 2007 (UTC) |
Hello Magnus animum, and thank you for playing the WP:BUPC. In the Tournament of Champions you pulled of 2 points with a massive competition. Thank you and congraturations. Marlith T/C 03:43, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Deletion
CSBot will now log directly to the WP:SCV page rather than a subpage; contents has already been moved there. — Coren (talk) 19:17, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks — Coren (talk) 19:23, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Blocked!
... okay, whatever you wanted the block for, it's there. Have a nice day! ~Kylu (u|t) 01:41, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Username blocks and autoblock
Howdy! At least one of your recent username blocks had autoblock enabled. Please don't do this, it prevents the user from coming back with an OK username. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 03:24, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Okies. Just one question: Shouldn't account creation be enabled as well (sorry if I sound a bit noobish, but I haven't been a sysop for a long time.
)? —« ANIMUM » 21:11, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Well, when you put a checkmark in 'account creation disabled', that prevents them from coming back with a new, proper username. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 21:53, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- and if the autoblock were enabled, the new username couldn't edit, correct? —« ANIMUM » 22:08, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- My words are failing me, I apologize for the confusion I've caused. Instead, please see this subsection of WP:BLOCK which communicates what I've been suggesting without my awkward phrasing. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 22:39, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- and if the autoblock were enabled, the new username couldn't edit, correct? —« ANIMUM » 22:08, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Well, when you put a checkmark in 'account creation disabled', that prevents them from coming back with a new, proper username. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 21:53, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Andrew Markwell page deleted
Hi Magnus,
You recently deleted page Andrew Markwell which I created, and which has a link to it on Candidates of the Australian general election, 2007. Your stated reason for deletion was, "Biographical article that does not assert significance", even though it contained references to three or four sources and indicated that the man is currently running for national election.
I would very much appreciate your help with two questions I have:
1. If a wikipedia article is not a suitable place for information on this candidate, where can I post information about this candidate so that I can link to it from Candidates of the Australian general election, 2007#Senate?
2. Is there any way that I can recover the text of the deleted article? It took me considerable time to research, word and tag correctly, although it is no doubt a very small effort compared to other wikipedians here.
Sincerely
Matthew 1130 14:24, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Autoblock
You want to take a look at this? Patriotic Republican seems to be autoblocked per your username block of User:Anti Shempite. Any objections to an unblock or thoughts on whether this is the same person or not?--Isotope23 talk 17:52, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Your page has been conquered by the Australian Cabal
Hello Magnus animum. I am here to inform you that your userpage or talk page has been conquered by the Australian Cabal. Please don’t panic; there is nothing you can do about it. You are hereby invited to join the Cabal, and help conquer other pages for our cause. See User:Giggy/Australian Cabal for more information. Thank you, have a nice day, and welcome to Australia. Giggy Talk 22:16, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- We could use gogetters like you. [2] Don't waste your skills vandalising our cabal, join us! Giggy Talk 22:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Outrageous redirect
I began an article today as part of an ongoing effort by myself to improve and add pertinent articles on Monterey area figures surrounding John Steinbeck, such as Bruce Ariss, and Ed Ricketts. The article I began was Pacific Biological Laboratories. While it was a small stub. It was better than many stubs that begin with a single sentence and I have been researching to expand it myself and add it to the Architecture project as well as others. But when I went back to it this evening I discovered that Viriditas had redirected the link to the Ed Ricketts article with no discussion, warning or if it was speedy deleted I knew nothing about it and was not given time to add a hangon. The building is notable and the article can be expanded and is of importance to many people including myself. If this user is not an admin I would like my article back, please! Even if he is I don't think it is right to just redirect without discussion the work of others. He copied my work to that article without any idea of how uncivil that was! I just can't believe it! Could you see what can be done.--Amadscientist 09:05, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- I believe it has worked itself out. The editor has restored the article and contributed. Although we warred for about an hour, we finally began working together and the article has gained greatly from it. Thank you.--Amadscientist 12:02, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Steven Spring Foundation
Why did you block User:Stevenspringfoundation before they even edited? Nothing in the name or in their lack of edits implies that they meant Wikipedia any harm, so escalating this to blocking just on the username was unjustified. You should consider talking to newbies whose usernames are minor violations of WP:U, possibly using the {{UsernameConcern}} template, instead of blocking as a first resort. rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 22:00, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- It wasn't unjustified - it's a promotional username [3], the user is quite welcome to go and create a new username. Ryan Postlethwaite 22:03, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- Blocks are meant to be preventative not punitive. Since their name is promotional any edit by them would be promotional, and thus it makes sense to block on sight. Until(1 == 2) 22:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- When you're trying to prevent something the user hasn't done yet, and which they may never do, you're taking it too far. Also, I think it's inappropriate to take this argument to Magnus Animum's talk page, when it was on your advice that I posted such a message here in the first place. rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 22:44, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- Blocks are meant to be preventative not punitive. Since their name is promotional any edit by them would be promotional, and thus it makes sense to block on sight. Until(1 == 2) 22:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Can you explain the content dispute at Jewish right with the anon editor? He's got a creepy edit history, and I'm wondering at what point to report it to administrators. You gave a vandalism warning, but that seemed to not quite capture the nature of why the revert was made. THF 23:36, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- It's not really appropriate for WP:AIV. Too subtle. (Indeed, admins could arguably sanction you for giving a vandalism warning.) In any event, the anon has undone your reversion (which, in any event, missed about twenty edits the anon made). THF 23:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- No offense meant. I've been warned for giving vandalism warnings for far less ambiguous conduct. THF 23:52, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Blocking
Excuse me? I am definitely not a sockpuppet in any way shape or form. I was asking that user to retrieve the page he deleted. I am utterly outraged you could think I should be blocked. Please reply to this message immediately. Onnaghar tl | co | @ 11:55, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- I see you have unblocked me, but please could you provide a reason for the block in the first place as the evidence shown doesn't seem to show any foul play. Thanks. Onnaghar tl | co | @ 19:44, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Ok, well thanks for providing some evidence of the rationale behind the decision. Im just a little bit miffed though that that blocklog will stay with my username forever. And so, the reasons behind the evidence given are:
- - For the RfA - I just wanted to give my opinion, and maybe get my edit count up. (But I dont do that always :) ) Onnaghar tl | co | @ 11:02, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Can you explain the content dispute at Jewish right with the anon editor? He's got a creepy edit history, and I'm wondering at what point to report it to administrators. You gave a vandalism warning, but that seemed to not quite capture the nature of why the revert was made. THF 23:36, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- It's not really appropriate for WP:AIV. Too subtle. (Indeed, admins could arguably sanction you for giving a vandalism warning.) In any event, the anon has undone your reversion (which, in any event, missed about twenty edits the anon made). THF 23:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- No offense meant. I've been warned for giving vandalism warnings for far less ambiguous conduct. THF 23:52, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Happy account creation day!
Have a great day! umdrums 05:12, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Smile
![]() |
Usernames
Congratulations on your new name! I changed mine a week ago. Singularity 22:05, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- Why haven't all your contribs been moved from your old name? Singularity 22:21, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm...strange. You know what's also strange? This is my 10,000th edit. Singularity 22:27, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose... ~ Wikihermit 01:04, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- I'll look into it. –Animum 01:08, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yay for usurpation! :) –sebi 01:29, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- I'll look into it. –Animum 01:08, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose... ~ Wikihermit 01:04, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm...strange. You know what's also strange? This is my 10,000th edit. Singularity 22:27, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/BJAODN. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/BJAODN/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/BJAODN/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Newyorkbrad 16:24, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Friend
Uh hum. --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (tαlk) 23:13, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Commited User Identity
How do you put them on your user page? HarrisonB Speak! 06:13, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Is this correct now? HarrisonB Speak! 02:51, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot. HarrisonB Speak! 03:00, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Requested block
Hello Animum, could you please block me for 5 minutes? I just need to see something about MediaWiki:Autoblockedtext, so please enable the autoblocker. Before blocking, please look at my contribs to make sure I'm online. Cheers, Lights 23:51, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Haha, nice summary! Cheers, Lights 00:05, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Question
Hello, I am trying to get an objective article about me and my work on Wikipedia. There is a summary of one of my plays (GODOT ARRIVES) that won the 1999 National New Play Contest but not of me.
It's not clear to me where to send it. I wrote up something, then learned we are not to write about ourselves, but my papers and letters are now collected by the San Francisco Public Library. That should be plenty of recogniton, no? Daniel Curzon: Danielcurzon 16:11, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Your page has been conquered by the Earth Cabal
Hello Animum/Archives/2007 I am here to inform you that your userpage or talk page has been conquered by the Earth Cabal. Please don’t panic; there is nothing you can do about it. You are hereby invited to join the Cabal, and help conquer other pages for our cause. See User:Hirohisat/Earth Cabal for more information. Thank you, have a nice, irregular weather day, and welcome to Earth. --Hirohisat Kiwi 20:03, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
I think I am going to explode
Your immensely complex userpage layout has caused my computer, and thus me, to explode. Just letting you know............ *Cremepuff222* 05:21, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- You have messages on your wiktionary account also. *Cremepuff222* 08:07, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Future events in Wikicalendar articles
Please have a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Days of the year for information on what types of entries are acceptable for Wikicalendar articles. The consensus is that future items should not be added. Additionally, the start date of the Olympics is not notable in and of itself and is considered a repetitive event - but we can have that discussion in a year. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 00:17, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- You'll have an uphill battle making it stick. Consensus is consensus. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 00:39, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- It would be better to continue this discussion here. Thanks. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 01:39, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
For the record:
There are FLOODS of other "historical pages" which are still open for editing, and that isn't usually discouraged. I don't think Wikipedia:Silly Things merits protection beyond the usual reasons (Vandalism, etc) and certainly not indefinite protection. 68.39.174.238 18:02, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Pang Page
You could leave the May Pang as it is. Please adhere to the 3RR rule.Sixstring1965
Sixstring1965The Beatles Wikiproject
Unfortunately, he was trying to bully you into backing off. You are at 2 reverts, while he was actually the one at his limit for the day. I appreciate your efforts to keep the article solid and free of crufty nonsense. :) - Arcayne (cast a spell) 01:41, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Mediation
I have postponed the closure, but just so you know, I happen to be a guy, not a "her". Thanks. Dreamy \*/!$! 23:31, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Its ok. I have had it a lot. A lot of people think that having Dreamafter as a name makes me a girl. Dreamy \*/!$! 23:36, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Good. :P Dreamy \*/!$! 23:41, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
"Treading on thin ice"
Unless you think that I too am treading on thin ice, could you kindly take another look at your comment to Matthew on Anonymous Dissident's RfA and consider slightly modifying the wording? Thanks, Newyorkbrad 23:58, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
E-mails
You have two e-mails from me. --(Review Me) R ParlateContribs@ (Let's Go Yankees!) 05:16, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Lynette Nusbacher
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Lynette Nusbacher. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. -- Jreferee (Talk) 20:32, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Block-stealing
I know! That happens to me all the time, like last night with User:Can't sleep, clown will eat me. bibliomaniac15 Tea anyone? 00:21, 30 August 2007 (UTC)