User talk:Animedude360

Welcome!

Hello, Animedude360, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Kukini 05:06, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Manualsnott.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Manualsnott.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you. -- Carnildo 12:50, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Tohji-132.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tohji-132.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. ReyBrujo 13:11, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Yui.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Yui.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. ReyBrujo 13:11, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Ritsuko.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ritsuko.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. ReyBrujo 13:11, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Gendo.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Gendo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. ReyBrujo 13:16, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Ryoji.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ryoji.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. ReyBrujo 13:16, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ghostbusters

Why did you change the format? Was there something wrong with the previous versian? Just wondering... TBC^{??? ??? ???} 15:46, 19 April 2006 (UTC) No, I just liked the look of thios one better. Seemed smoother and less bluky. Nothing really wrong with the old you. But this is wikipedia and you can change it back at any time, just search for "Template:Ghostbusters" and use the history. Animedude360 19:30, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rodger Bumpass

Sorry! I had to get rid of your edits because the other user put in a lie, Rodger Bumpass is not dead nor is he in the hospital, there is no online article saying that Rodger Bumpass is dead nor in the hospital. He is alive and well. I hope you get this message. Thank You.--Stco23 19:38, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody has been putting in nonsense in Rodger Bumpass again, but by a different user. I am change it back to the way it was before. I am sorry that i am going to revert your edit because of this. 58.108.63.208 changed Rodger Bumpass birth date from 1938 to 1959. IMDB.com has the correct birth date. This user has also put nonsense on Scott Menville so he is a vandal. Next time you better check on the internet to see if the information is true before you edit, that way it can better help you find a vandal. Anytime you want to ask me a question, just go to my talk page. Thank You.--Stco23 04:10, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hammeler

user:Hammeler has been putting wrong information about Rodger Bumpass. He first put in (He was involed with the Rodger Bumpass scandal), and then he put in that Rodger Bumpass was in the hospital, and finally he put in that he was dead. He has been warned about putting nonsense, and putting in nonsense is vandalism. If you see nonsense by this user, Have him reported. He is vandalzing Wikipedia. Thank You.--Stco23 22:52, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:EWJsuitskipping.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:EWJsuitskipping.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:46, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The A-kon 17 "report"

As entertaining as that was, it's a bit biased, and one of Wikipedia's main guidelines is to have fair, balanced articles. I also suspect that when you said "many" were outraged/annoyed/had already bought glowsticks, you meant yourself, your friends, and any people nearby you happened to overhear or talk to. So maybe 10 or 15 at the most for some examples. I've left it in the article for now (though with the typos and some of the hyperbole edited), but someone else may come along and be well within their rights to edit it down or even delete it altogether. Just something to keep in mind. Wikipedia isn't your blog.

Also, was this your first A-kon? Because these problems are not new. Maybe they were at their worst this time, but this has been going on for years now. Frecklegirl 05:23, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you messaged me about the A-kon article. Well I jsut wanted to let you know that I was not the one to add the section about A-kon 17. I mearly edited it to make it less biased. It was posted by a user before me. I am aware of the rules and guillines of Wikipedia. I have attended several A-kons, but was unable to attend 17, so I could not fix the article probperly. If you have any questions, let me know. (Animedude 09:39, 19 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Jigaw (comics)

You should discuss you changes on the talk page. I think two pages would be better as well, but there is a debate about it. - Peregrinefisher 08:40, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I posted what I did and what I think is best on the disscioun page for Jigsaw (comics). Thansk for the tip. (Animedude 08:49, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Myers

(This topic wouldn't have been suitable for that talk page) He isn't literally pushing 50. Remember, film timelines don't always coincide with reality. In his fictional universe he's currently still lik 41 years old. And as long as he's in good shape, he's fine, plus in his fictional universe he's got abnormal strenght, endurance, durability and will power. Bignole 10:20, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Adopted fictional characters

Hi. I noticed that you nominated the above category for merging earlier today, but you did not finish off the nomination. Please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion#How to use this page for details on how to complete the listing. Then you can give your reason for the nomination. (P.S. I also notice that you created Category:Fictional adoptees this morning, and I believe nominating Category:Adopted fictional characters for renaming would have been more appropriate than creating a new category first.) — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 15:15, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, guy

Hey. Sorry to be the barer of bad news, but Category:Resurrected fictional characters, like Category:Fictional resurrected characters before it, was deleted for a reason. It will only be deleted again, I am afraid. A censensus was reacted and I know one admin willing to keep this category down. I'll submit the category for speedy deletion with a request for protection from recreation or something. ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 07:31, 7 October 2006 (UTC) Mind telling me why? Wikipedia is pretty picky about this kinda stuff, yet flagarent in other areas. I mean there is a category for gay fictional characters, yet not one for straight ones. Anyway, since these pagese were deleted I cant see WHY they were on their talk pages. (Animedude 07:36, 7 October 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Your edit to Super Suit

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! --M1ss1ontom a rs2k4 ^{(T | C | @)} 23:46, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

about hanzozatori or whatever

seems like hes on a rampaging edit, i suggest summon an adminstrator to mediate, i reviewed his talk page comments and even got a suspension from 3RR, makes a pretty good rep on how he reacts †Bloodpack† 20:18, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

in ur base, messing ur articles

I love how you use most of my "mess" ayway. Or is it not a mess after all? The tiny-weeny thumbnail looks veeeery awkward, but I guess you like it more this way. --HanzoHattori 20:22, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Homosexuality in Modern Japan

You didn't make it clear whether you wanted citations to prove that Japan is more accomedating than the US, or if the US is less accomodating than Japan, so I've added two citations explaining the low level of prejudice in Japan in historical context. Both are WP:V and WP:RS books available through Amazon.

I felt that you're exact question ("is this true for the countries culture or just in their entertainment?") didn't need answering with a citation as a country's entertainment is a product of its culture. For example American parents would riot if Mickey Mouse and Goofy kissed passionately on screen, which is why it wouldn't happen, but things like that happen every day in Anime and Manga (see shonen ai). Anyway addressing wider comparative culture is outside of the scope of the article.

perfectblue 13:04, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Advocacy

Hi, I'm David, from the Association of Members' Advocates, and I've agreed to help you with your problem. As I see it, your objectives are probably twofold: firstly, to achieve the merging of The Punisher (arcade game) into Punisher computer and video games, a reasonable enough goal on its face, since virtually all of the information in the first article is duplicated in the main one, and secondly to stop HanzoHattori's campaign of incivility against you. Now, the actions I propose to take on these issues are:

Leave a friendly note on HanzoHatti's talk page, reminding him of WP:CIV and WP:OWN, and asking him to remember to be polite. If he should continue with the language he has used in the past, we can consider a user-conduct request for comment against him.
Re-open the discussion on Talk:The Punisher (arcade game), and perhaps consider asking for a third opinion or an article request for comment.

I hope all this sounds reasonable. If not, please do let me know. David Mestel^(Talk) 18:06, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Winston Zeddemore

Thanks for filling out the Winston Zeddemore article. I've been meaning to do that for a while now. Now, all the Ghostbusters have their own articles. Good work! Wavy G 05:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Weirdalclassic.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Weirdalclassic.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. - crz crztalk 21:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I tracked down the original website, found out that it's not a screenshot from a video, and tagged it again for RFU. - crz crztalk 19:39, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dragon World

Please see Talk:Dragon World dispute for your vote on whether we should keep the Human (Dragon World) article or have it merged into Dragon World. Thanks! Power level (Dragon Ball) 15:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Meganekko

Why did you remove the content on male glasses-wearers that females find moe? Men aren't the only otaku out there, and with series like Angelique, Ouran High School Host Club and La Corda D'Oro all having aired this year, attention is being shed on female moe. Don't act like, to quote a popular Internet meme, "there are no girls on the internet". Sana Jisushi 04:53, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I beg to differ with the reply you posted on my talk page. The male megane-zokusei is no more "something some girls made up" than the female. As I said before, attention is being brought to women as reverse-harems and bishounen anime are gaining popularity, and as stated in the article, there are in fact distinct archetypes. The sinister senpai and the pure-hearted weak boy are just as recognizable as the powerful īnchō and the nervous weak girl. In short, the megane-kun thing does belong in the article! Sana Jisushi 21:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move Hercule (Dragon Ball) to Mister Satan

It's happening again. Place your vote/comment on the respective talk page for which name Wikipedia should use; a censored name, or an orignal name. ^{Power level (Dragon Ball)} 15:16, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request

I suggest an RfC for Human(Dragon Ball) so that others can contribute to the discussion beyond the small number you have currently. \/\/slack (talk) 23:30, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AMA

I am the person who will be helping you out in this case. Contact me at my desk. --Sir james paul 01:40, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please answer the following on my desk please.

Would you prefer to discuss this privately?/Would you mind if we discuss this on your talk page?
How would you describe the problem?
What outcome did you expect to obtain by requesting an Advocate?
What outcome do you think would be best for you? Would this be the best outcome for Wikipedia as a whole?
How important is this issue to you? How important do you believe this issue is to the community and to Wikipedia?
What do you feel caused this problem, and is there anything you could have done to avoid it?
Do you think it might help to take a break while we attempt to resolve this?

--Sir james paul 04:47, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Answer the questions on my talk page but all dicussions will be on my desk. There is a link to it on my user page.--Sir james paul 05:19, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Read this[1] page. It will help you during this conflict.--Sir james paul 07:22, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All dicussion about this is happening at my desk. Would you agree to merging it with a new article called "Races (Dragon Ball)". This I feel is the best compromise but if you have any other ideas tell us them. Have a nice week and god bless.--Sir james paul 16:16, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What we are going to do is take a small break from this and see if it will get better. Contact me on my talk page. Have a nice week and god bless.--Sir james paul 11:51, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to find a compromise but nemu did not agree with it. The best thing for all of us to do is close this thing and just froget about it. Please tell me what you think on my talk page. I feel sory we all could not work together to find a conpromise that we could all agree with. Do you think the 21 is a good date to close this thing?--§Sir James Paul<<--wikiholic§ 03:09, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Smile

Sir james paul has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Image copyright problem with Image:Weirdalclassic.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Weirdalclassic.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr 10:29, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AMA case is closed

Your case has been closed. Everything is now calm and the other editors have decided to move on. Merry Christmas.--§Sir James Paul<<--wikiholic§ 04:11, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Human (Dragon Ball)

Hey Animedude, to tell ya the truth; I never agreed to have that article redirected to Dragon World. What do ya think? We have to find a way to somehow place enough info. to the article so that it won't be redirected like that again. I have suggested that we should take out some info from Dragon World regarding humans and put it there. So then, what do you think? How can we solve this? Power level (Dragon Ball) 03:02, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Are you still around? It would be great if ya could respond to my above comment regarding Human (Dragon Ball)... Power level (Dragon Ball) 23:18, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:EWJeviljim.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:EWJeviljim.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 09:11, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dragonball Wiki

Hi there. I noticed you're fan of the Dragon Ball series, and I'm trying to recruit some fans from here to contribute to the Dragon Ball Wiki. It's in terrible shape right now with pretty much no consistency or policies, and only this week have I been able to get Angela and Sannse to create some Forums for us over there. I've got a proposed Manual of Style going over there and would like some people to contribute to that to set up some policies and start making the wiki bigger, better, and more intelligible/consistent. If you're interested, please hop on over or talk to me. Thanks for the time, whether you're interested or not. Wildyoda 08:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Punisher (2004 film)

Hi, just FYI, I was the "wise guy" who "screwed" with the article. As you are no doubt aware, you can change anything on Wikipedia. If you don't like something, change it but please don't criticise others. Remember to be civil. Malla nox 07:26, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Daywalker

I've nominated Daywalker, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Daywalker satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daywalker and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Daywalker during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chunky Rice 18:06, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:EWJrocket.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:EWJrocket.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 00:07, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:EWJorigin.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:EWJorigin.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:56, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:EWJjim.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:EWJjim.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:56, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Sonic Crackers(betatest) 001.JPG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Sonic Crackers(betatest) 001.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Manualcrow.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Manualcrow.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:EWJPrincess.jpg

I have tagged Image:EWJPrincess.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 16:42, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:EWJSnott.jpg

I have tagged Image:EWJSnott.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 16:43, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:EWJmutantpeter.jpg

I have tagged Image:EWJmutantpeter.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 16:44, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:EWJpeter.jpg

I have tagged Image:EWJpeter.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 16:44, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Slimer2.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Slimer2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 13:35, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Manualcrow.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Manualcrow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:47, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:EWJPrincess.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:EWJPrincess.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:46, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:EWJSnott.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:EWJSnott.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:46, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:EWJmutantpeter.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:EWJmutantpeter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:46, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:EWJpeter.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:EWJpeter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:46, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Weirdalclassic.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Weirdalclassic.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 11:49, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh My Goddess!

A goddess descends to your talk page

Hi, I noticed your username appears on this category and would like to invite you to take part in a general improvement drive on all articles relevant to Oh My Goddess! including character articles, episode articles and others. -- Cat ^chi? 20:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of Earthworm Jim locations

I have nominated List of Earthworm Jim locations, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Earthworm Jim locations. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:53, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Narutard

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pumpmeup 14:13, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:EWJ3d.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:EWJ3d.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:EWJAPeter.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:EWJAPeter.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Unstablemolecules.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Unstablemolecules.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:16, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Juggernaut Bitch!!

An editor has nominated The Juggernaut Bitch!!, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Juggernaut Bitch!! and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 11:44, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Unstablemolecules.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Unstablemolecules.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ExtremeGhostbusters.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ExtremeGhostbusters.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ewjm2g.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ewjm2g.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:00, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ewjm2ggame.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Ewjm2ggame.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:00, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Manualbob.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Manualbob.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Earthworm Jim items

I have nominated List of Earthworm Jim items, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Earthworm Jim items. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 01:06, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Meganekko

An article that you have been involved in editing, Meganekko, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meganekko. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Shinobu (talk) 01:50, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Butt stomp

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Butt stomp, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Richiekim (talk) 20:34, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Liquidator (Darkwing Duck)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Liquidator (Darkwing Duck). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liquidator (Darkwing Duck). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:14, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:EarthWormJim3D.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:EarthWormJim3D.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 00:11, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nickelodeon compounds for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nickelodeon compounds is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nickelodeon compounds until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 03:51, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Yui.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yui.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:52, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Proton pack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Proton pack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proton pack until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.. - Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 08:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dub parody

Category:Dub parody, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:19, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request for opinion

Hi Animedude360: Sorry to trouble you, but I could not help but notice your expression of affection for TOS on the Wikipedians who like Star Trek: The Original Series page, and so I would be curious of your thoughts on the notability of a Star Trek author for whom I just created a Wikipedia article -- which may be promptly destined for the trash pile. As a newcomer here at Wikipedia, my first article attempt was indeed recommended for deletion within hours of its creation by a senior user named JzG who seems to me to be overly hostile and dismissive of Star Trek, calling it fancruft (= trivial, obscure, of importance to just a tiny group of fanatics) . Since you are a Trek fan, if it is also your good faith opinion that my subject is in no way deserving of an article on this site; and you could let me know, I would feel much more comfortable with the justice of the pending deletion action. My proposed article may be seen here, assuming you visit the page soon enough ... https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Gerald_Gurian Kind Regards. Tosresearcher (talk) 05:07, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"List of Earthworm Jim items" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect List of Earthworm Jim items. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 21#List of Earthworm Jim items until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jontesta (talk) 19:59, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional human races has been nominated for merging

Category:Fictional human races has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]