User talk:AnikaZaman24

May 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:12, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to Ashraful Islam Jhohan, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 23:29, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, AnikaZaman24. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Also read WP:OWN Joseph2302 (talk) 22:13, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no affiliation with the subject. I am a new writer at wikipedia and I wanted to take over this article. AnikaZaman24 (talk) 22:16, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

People don't "take over" articles, as per WP:OWN. And what you're doing is clearly trying to edit as a proxy for them, which still comes under COI. The artixle has been edited by COI editors, so the tag is correct. I assume you came to Wikipedia after their social media posts about this article? Joseph2302 (talk) 22:20, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no affiliation with them and I did not come here because of any social media posts. I simply want to better this article and I am not acting as any proxy for them. The article was edited by COI editors and they will no longer edit it in the future. I will edit this article from a neutral point of view and for that the tag should be removed please. COI is resolved as per the terms and conditions of Wikipedia. AnikaZaman24 (talk) 22:28, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The COI tag should stay until the article is cleaned up. And there's no way you can know they'll never edit again, unless you know them/have spoken to them (in which case you would have a COI). Remove the tag again, and I'll report you to WP:ANI to be blocked. It's disruptive, and you don't own the page, and the page needs cleaning up (or hopefully, it'll be deleted soon and then all the nonsense editors can leave). Joseph2302 (talk) 22:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Saiful Islam Jitu per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Saiful Islam Jitu. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 16:50, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]