User talk:Angli Cado Primoris

Nemesea

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Nemesea, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://payplay.cd/nemesea. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 03:26, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status of Nemesea

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Nemesea. For legal reasons, we will delete copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites (http://payplay.cd/nemesea in this case) or from printed material.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article's talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Nemesea with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article's talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Nemesea with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own original words to avoid any copyright infringement. Thank you. P4k 03:29, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Same for Lunatica. -- Bryan (talk|commons) 15:22, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of female metal singers and notablility

Hi there. I see that you've noticed that I removed Brenda Jezabel Cuesta from the list of female metal singers. The reason I did this is because Ms. Cuesta does not appear to meet the criteria for notability as described in http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_%28music%29 If she does, in fact, meet the criteria, and I am incorrect in my assessment, please let me know. Otherwise, please stop reinserting her into the list. Thank you very much. Asarelah 17:42, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reinserting Ms. Cuesta into the list. She simply is not notable enough for Wikipedia. Asarelah (talk) 00:23, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. I don't want to have to ask an adminstrator to intervene here.Asarelah (talk) 20:42, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am writing to inform you that I have left a Wikiquette alert regarding this issue at http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#User:Angli_Cado_Primoris_and_List_of_female_metal_singers

I hope that we can resolve this issue amicably. Asarelah (talk) 06:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Angli Cado Primoris. I'm a volunteer at WP:WQA, where User:Asarelah posted her alert. I concur entirely with everything that she has said: continually re-inserting this name without being prepared to defend her notability when challenged is in clear violation of Wikipedia policy (notably WP:EDIT WAR, and if you continue you risk being blocked by an administrator. I'd strongly encourage you to discuss any changes before reverting. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 06:24, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations are not allowed!

Please stop copying the band biography of Lunatica from their website. This is a copyright violation and not allowed! -- Bryan (talk|commons) 20:39, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to List of female heavy metal singers, you will be blocked from editing. VivioFa teFan ^{(Talk, Sandbox)} 03:26, 24 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to List of female heavy metal singers, you will be blocked from editing. VivioFa teFan ^{(Talk, Sandbox)} 10:49, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I left a response to what you wrote in Talk:List of female heavy metal singers. Just letting you know. And please do not blank your talk page, especially not the warnings against vandalism. Asarelah (talk) 21:20, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Bloodparade

A tag has been placed on Bloodparade requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WebHamster 22:05, 25 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of female heavy metal singers. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. VivioFa teFan ^{(Talk, Sandbox)} 00:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Angli Cado Primoris

Its fine. Don't worry about it. Asarelah (talk) 01:19, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bloodflowerz

The article Bloodflowerz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Searches found nothing at all and that's not surprising as there's even hardly much here including at the other Wikis especially German therefore there's nothing to suggest a better article here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]