User talk:AngelaRola

Arslan Sheraz

I can't judge these things by reading your mind as to what you thought your intentions were; I can only judge these things by reading the tone of the words present in the article. And the tone present in the article was promotional and advertorial and not encyclopedic. It doesn't mean he can never have an article — if you or somebody else can do better, then by all means go right ahead — but whether you meant it that way or not, it was "promotional/advertising" as written the first time. Bearcat (talk) 06:36, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I can't just restore it directly to articlespace in its current state, but I've restored it to your user "sandbox" so that you have some time to work on it at your convenience. It'll be at User:AngelaRola/Arslan Sheraz. In addition to toning down some of the language, you'll also need to improve the sourcing — what we need for referencing is reliable source coverage in media (newspapers, magazines, etc.) that's actually about him in a substantive way, not just directories linking to copies of his video on YouTube. Notability, for our purposes, is not a measure of what an article says, but how well the things it says can be referenced to media coverage which verifies that the information is correct. Hope that helps a bit. Bearcat (talk) 16:25, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You so much Bercat now I got your points :) I will take care of what you mentioned :)

Speedy deletion nomination of Arslan Sheraz

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Arslan Sheraz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kleuske (talk) 13:44, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arslan Sheraz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arslan Sheraz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arslan Sheraz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 18:59, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arslan Sheraz. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 03:00, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:AngelaRola/Arslan Sheraz

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:AngelaRola/Arslan Sheraz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Saqib (talk) 08:17, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AngelaRola, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Quasar G ^{t - c} 11:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]