User talk:Anetode/archive 2
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
72.197.2.40
Thx for the info - does that apply to all pages or just current events? Also wil lt hose bad marks on my talk page ever go away/ wil lthose effect me? it says its gonna block me if i make any more edits, but i want to keep adding to wikipedia :( (I am 72.197.2.40)
K ,thx :) BTW- user page / talk page- are these not the same thing? Just got kind of worried cause Nlu seems mad at me for making mistakes :( http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Current_events&action=history
Thanks for yet more suggestions. I kind of liked how SWAT combined the regular shootouts with stealth tactics together. By the way, the IGI page could use some formatting and cleaning. - Mgm|(talk) 08:42, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Anetode/archive 2! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. AmiDaniel (Talk) 05:17, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Personal Websites as Secondary Sources
WP:RS states: Personal websites and blogs may never be used as secondary sources. Please note, the emphisis is present on that page, I am not changing the statement as it appears on that page. Terryeo 15:12, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
- I've never referenced a personal website or blog as a secondary source. If you're concerned about citations found in the Dianetics article, discuss it at Talk:Dianetics, and try to be mindful of consensus. ˉˉanetode╞┬╡ 15:24, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Terryeo selectively editing posts
I've just discovered Terryeo selectively editing a post to him from on his user talk page. [1] While my post to him was not, I admit, perfectly CIVIL (I have not yet found the secret to keeping perfectly calm while someone pretends I'm simple-minded and completely gullible) what he edited out was not merely my rhetorical excesses but my explanation to him of why he could not treat a source that was also available on a "personal website" as if that was the only place it was available. You might want to check and see if he has similarly edited any of your own posts to him. -- Antaeus Feldspar 20:58, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:KZ3.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:KZ3.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ReyBrujo 21:57, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging for Image:Tekken6.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tekken6.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:55, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Jewish ethnicity
i haven't done anything except for ask for sources. i will continue to remove those opinions until someone cites a source, as is wp standard. i have no problem with anything jewish as long as there is a source. now please cite a source or keep your pov to yourself. thanks 68.71.99.45 04:28, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- ok, i'll add the [citation needed] there. 68.71.99.45 04:53, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
VandalProof 1.2 Now Available
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f4/Vandalprooflock.jpg/180px-Vandalprooflock.jpg)
After a lenghty, but much-needed Wikibreak, I'm happy to announce that version 1.2 of VandalProof is now available for download! Beyond fixing some of the most obnoxious bugs, like the persistent crash on start-up that many have experienced, version 1.2 also offers a wide variety of new features, including a stub-sorter, a global user whitelist and blacklist, navigational controls, and greater customization. You can find a full list of the new features here. While I believe this release to be a significant improvement over the last, it's nonetheless nowhere near the end of the line for VandalProof. Thanks to Rob Church, I now have an account on test.wikipedia.org with SysOp rights and have already been hard at work incorporating administrative tools into VandalProof, which I plan to make available in the near future. An example of one such SysOp tool that I'm working on incorporating is my simple history merge tool, which simplifies the process of performing history merges from one article into another. Anyway, if you haven't already, I'd encourage you to download and install version 1.2 and take it out for a test-drive. As always, your suggestions for improvement are always appreciated, and I hope that you will find this new version useful. Happy editing! --AmiDaniel (talk) 02:05, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
I mind.
You removed information from my User page. Your statement was, "I hope you don't mind." This is a reply to you. I mind. Terryeo 22:29, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Paul Cyr accidently posted to your User page instead of the User talk page, I moved his comment. Are you going to reprimand him too, or is this just my special reward for trying to help? ˉˉanetode╞┬╡ 22:42, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
You are free to read my page and see what I did, free to read Paul's page and see what he does, too. And of course, free to read the page involved and see what goes on there. Thank you for making a clean edit summary which told what you did. Terryeo 05:29, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Apologies...
...for wiping away an edit with my revert of Dead or Alive. I don't know how it happened - well, truthfully I *do*, but admitting I clicked the wrong thing is naught but the first step to supreme and utter defeat - but I apologize for blanking your contributions.
Seems to be going on alot around here, but I "hope you don't mind". Sorry. Papacha 03:29, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Billgatesteen.jpg
Okay, that's a fine reason to remove it from the article. This reason wasn't clear in your edit comments.
Damn shame. It's a heckuva photo.Phiwum 07:27, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Rolls-Royce-100EX-Concept-'.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rolls-Royce-100EX-Concept-'.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:06, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for getting to the point about Fair Use better than I could. I don't get what that one guy has such a problem with. But I was almost certain that he was wrong, and I appreciate your helping out. As to whether the song page itself should be deleted, that's thankfully up to the community and not a single user. Wahkeenah 17:41, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello Anetode. When you use template tags on talk pages, it'd be much appreciated if you could substitute according to the guidelines at Wikipedia:Template substitution. Just add subst: to the tag; for example, {{subst:bv}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Thanks. :) --Rory096 18:05, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
COTW Project
You voted for Lee Smith (baseball), this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article.
3100 is a year of the 31st century, not the 30th. Night Gyr 23:24, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Man versus Beast
I deprodded this. It was a TV show that ran on a nationwide network, although briefly, and it's okay for us to have stub articles on WP. Mangojuicetalk 19:15, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page. (I didn't even notice it until now! :-)) --Nlu (talk) 16:04, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- No problem, glad to repay the favor ˉˉanetode╞┬╡ 17:03, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Orwell
Yes - agree re conservative.--Cunningham 11:18, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Moving pages ?
Hi, thanks for moving the Prezista entry ... one of my firsta actions at Wikipedia was to move a page. As you can see, the history is not moved with the page when copying just the content. And ... some people really flame you for this, I will not. The next time you should maybe ask an administrator to move the history, too. Happy editing, I love Wikipedia and the collaborative work ... JKW 11:58, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- The history is currently preserved at the prezista redirect, although I agree that it is a pretty sloppy way of doing it. Next time I'll ask an admin to move the history, thanks for the suggestion. ˉˉanetode╞┬╡ 12:01, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- Colleague ... *big grin* JKW 12:07, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Cleanup Template
My bot, Alphachimpbot, has just modified some of your cleanup templates. {{Cleanup|MONTH YEAR}} is not a valid template. Use {{Cleanup-date|MONTH YEAR}} instead. Just figured that I would tell you. --Alphachimp talk 17:07, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Featured Picture
![]() |
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Moai Rano raraku.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
|
Congratulations! --Fir0002 01:07, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Khalidbinmahfouz.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Khalidbinmahfouz.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
y are you hating
hey thanks for for the reference to Uncyclopedia the shit is hysterical, but did you have to be so ruff seriously damm. nigga —Preceding unsigned comment added by Romeo grant (talk • contribs)
- You must have me confused with someone who has a sense of humor, like DS. ˉˉanetode╞┬╡ 13:24, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
I noticed the main article was severely lacking in information. As such, I taken the liberty of expanding the article. Details here. Comments..? -ZeroTalk 22:14, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- Nice work. Minor suggestion: retitle the criticism header to "Sex to sell". ˉˉanetode╞┬╡ 22:00, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging for Image:59786-5.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:59786-5.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:04, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- I love you, OrphanBot. ˉˉanetode╞┬╡ 02:18, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
My very first death threat
block for calling you a pedant? how about a block for finding out your true identity and hunting you down and shooting you repeatedly in the head as ive done to other fucking pedants on this site? block me for that you dead pedant! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.224.217.39 (talk • contribs)
Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my page. --Nlu (talk) 16:50, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
FYI, IP vandal signing your name
Just an FYI, an IP vandal signed your name along with mine to some vandalism [2]. I reverted the edit. Thought you would like to know. -- Gogo Dodo 02:00, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Image:Pdficon small.gif listed for deletion
The Red Carpet Photographer's Barnstar
Thank you!! I'm getting embaressed Nyikita 08:46, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
I've made a slight redesign on the uniform Template:General CVG character. I've stated reasoning on the WP:CVG talkpage. Any comments on the new design would be appreciated. -Randall Brackett 07:55, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Arcade flyers
Hi, I was wondering if you could give me your opinion on using arcade flyers for both representation and identification within {{Infobox Arcade game}}. I noticed you uploaded a number of flyers and I sort of took the hint and added more to keep arcade related articles stylistically consistent, but I ran into opposition along the way. Basically I am just polling to see where people stand if this is perhaps a matter best left at the editor's discretion. Thank you. o/s/p 13:28, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- The new Infobox is now in full effect. I've already taken the liberty to summarize the video output fields Video resolution and Monitor into a single field labeled Display. Could you swing by and see if there's anything else that can be improved? Usage on talk will have to be updated to accommodate the new structure as well. Cheers //osp 14:06, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Can you swing by Image talk:MGS4 Snake.jpg again? Jonny2x4 reverted straight back to the render version, has reverted four times, and is being a bit taciturn, and I could use some help. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 14:07, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Cleanup Taskforce
The article Jack Sparrow (the character from the movie Pirates of the Carribean) has been added to your desk. Please look at it and either accept or let me know and I'll reassign it. Thank you. RJFJR 03:36, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Please do not vote on the RfA's that already closed
Please do not vote on the RfA's that already closed and archived. Instead go to WP:RfA and participate in open requests abakharev 23:37, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- No problems abakharev 02:57, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Blackbeard's Age
Why did you change the year of Blackbeard's birth back to 1680? I have seen no evidence that says he was born in 1680. The article also says that Blackbeard's birth is BELIEVED to be in 1680, but that's not solid fact. Unless there is evidence that he was born in the year 1680, not 1681, 1682 or any other year, I believe the year of his birth should be changed back. Bcody 15:01, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
AGA cooker
New photo taken, uploaded and linked. It's not a great photo (but then the original photo on that page wasn't great either). --Rbirkby 11:57, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Infobox CVG syntax guide
Hi, I began drafting on a syntax guide to go along with aforementioned infobox and I'm enquiring if there's any interest in one being made. I suppose the reason is mainly to clarify certain fields and bring it closer in line with other projects such as films and books etc. Anyway, you'll find it at User:Combination/Sandbox. Thanks for your time. Combination 18:50, 26 July 2006 (UTC) (formerly "Vic Vipr")
Colbert/Elephant
Hey, had to do it once. Thanks for the revert.
User:notque
Stephen Colbert Is My God
He told me to do it. If anything, blame him.
I love him.
:P
so just how many people edited it anyway? :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Taylorhewitt (talk • contribs)