Jump to content

User talk:Andy5421

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Andy5421, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Daveydweeb (chat/patch) 10:28, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deo Volente

[edit]

Are you one of Jehovah's Witnesses? Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 08:01, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am Andy5421 (talk) 21:17, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Correcting mistakes

[edit]

Hi there! I've just undone your edit at Talk:The End of Time. It's not generally acceptable to change other people's comments on talk pages. I realise that you only changed spelling to make it more readable, but essentially, those comments aren't yours to change. It's encouraged to change other people's mistakes on articles, not on talk pages. Thanks :o) GedUK  16:10, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ok sorry Andy5421 (talk) 12:51, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK, it's only because you were trying to be helpful, which is clearly a good thing! GedUK  13:58, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AFD Nominations

[edit]

If you nominate another article for deletion in the future please read WP:AFDHOWTO carefully. For Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silentlambs Step II was not followed properly and Step III was not done at all. I have completed the steps for you but had I not, the AFD outcome would have been invalid. --NeilN talk to me 18:42, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing it. Andy5421 (talk) 15:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The majority has spoken: Keep Andy5421 (talk) 07:04, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update on main JW page

[edit]

Don't know if you are still editing, but I've been working on the main Jehovah's Witness page. If there are any comments for the talk section on possible edits and ideas, it is appreciated by all involved. Thanks. I've been off for a while, but just now started editing again with a little better spirit than previously. 173.3.43.103 (talk) 01:56, 20 May 2010 (UTC)Natural[reply]

"A little better spirit?" It seems to be a return to the same old strategy of labelling every non-Witness source as a vile apostate. BlackCab (talk) 12:00, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not everyone who is a non-witness is an apostate. It depends on their attitudes and heart condition. Andy5421 (talk) 22:47, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Like you have any room to talk BlackCab..... Andy5421 (talk) 22:54, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't remember editing the main JW page but I usually leave that to LTSally

Orphaned non-free image File:Biodamper.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Biodamper.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.

This also applies to:

These were all orphaned due to having been removed from List of Doctor Who items per policy WP:NFCC on minimal use, as explained at WP:NFLISTS. Please do not restore these images to that list. If you have questions, ask. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 14:28, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice while it lasted Andy5421 (talk) 04:38, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Traces of Death III has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Quite unclear, probably a non notable film.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. OSborn arfcontribs. 17:57, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Back off I'm just starting on it. Andy5421 (talk) 18:03, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Traces of Death III for deletion

[edit]

The article Traces of Death III is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traces of Death III until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. OSborn arfcontribs. 18:26, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of nominating it for deletion contribute to and make it better. Whatever. Last time I try to create an article if this shit is gonna happen within the first few minutes of its creation. Andy5421 (talk) 18:37, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to start it in your userspace before adding it to the main article space. Generally nobody will request deletion for those. You can request someone move it into your userspace (unsure if I can myself) which will make the AfD irrelevant. OSborn arfcontribs. 18:40, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How do I do that? (user space)? Andy5421 (talk) 18:51, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To start a new article, go to User:Andy5421/NewPageNameHere and edit the page. In this case, the I think the easiest option is to request an admin userify the article for you on the AfD page. (So the admin moves the page and closes the AfD and everything.) OSborn arfcontribs. 19:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am not an administrator, but I userfied the subject article per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traces of Death III. It may now be found at User:Andy5421/Traces of Death III. Please make a note of Wikipedia's content policies, especially notability and verifiability before trying to move this back into the article space. —KuyaBriBriTalk 20:41, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In Whoniverse, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Canon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to work on fixing it. Andy_Howard (talk)

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited ASP (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asp (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Watershed (television), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chilling effect (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Bullet Catch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hype (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited City of Vice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sodomite (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:26, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited E Nomine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King Herod (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you added to March 24, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. The article that you edited has notability guidelines for the addition of events to the list. Refer to WP:DOY for details on what are acceptable entries in Wikicalendar articles. Thank you. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 12:03, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Says who? Andy_Howard (talk) 12:09, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Says WP:DOY. We work based on consensus here. If you disagree, make your case at WT:DOY. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 12:14, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

[edit]
The Barnstar of High Culture
In recognition of your more than 1,000 edits to the encyclopedia, especially when it comes to articles related to art and culture. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 18:51, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Andy_Howard (talk) 21:07, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I Love the '80s Strikes Back, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PSA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Last Week Tonight with John Oliver, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ISIS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I Love the '80s 3-D, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages KISS and Splash. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Andy5421. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Andy5421/Traces of Death III, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Andy5421/Traces of Death III and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Andy5421/Traces of Death III during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 06:24, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Andy5421. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Andy5421. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Andy5421. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]