User talk:Andrewtsalmon/sandbox
The sentences/table about Toronto generally, don't really fit into this section. Keep in mind that this will be part of a bigger article where Toronto is already introduced. You could put general info from your article that intro to the larger article, if you have some that isn't already there.
The paragraph that begins "There are social Institutions that help with the preservation of the Spanish language" seems like it should go in the Inst. Support, rather than Status section. Can you provide links to those institutions? That is typical in Wikipedia articles.
Check each paragraph to make sure it's in the correct section.
A lot of the information that you provide is not supported by citations. Please add references or links.
Check formatting of references. They are incomplete and not uniform. Naomi TBB199 (talk) 19:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Great work! I would suggest citing your sources/ facts whenever you state something that you have found from articles (this is to prevent plagiarism and as well, it will make it look more scholarly since you are backing it up with a scholarly journal). Otherwise, it was good!
Serenawsli (User talk:Serenawsli) 12:00, 02, February 2016 (UTC)
peer review
[edit]Really good webpage!!! You have a good statistic graph and a lot of data to proof the facts. Enough information for the readers and describe the information clearly and easy to be understand. A lot of citations behind the whole article but not in the article. Maybe you can tried to citied some sentences in the article. Good photo which you original take it by yourself and really good structure of your whole webpage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jingxin Wang (talk • contribs) 03:00, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
another peer review
[edit]I agree with the review above in that your webpage is really good. However, the demographics was interesting, but it feels like it's missing some information. When you were talking about the density of Spanish speakers changing in as you got closer to the center of the city it seemed like there was going to be an explanation, or at least some more information but it ended right there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Rosmarinus (talk • contribs) 02:39, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Another suggestion based on my perviously reviewed
[edit]It becomes a really perfect webpage, with: 1. Enough information for the readers who don't know the Spanish in Toronto. 2. A lot of citation though the whole webpage. 3. A lot of data to prove the truth.
And, you could add a little bit more pictures on you webpage. One pictures probably is not enough.