User talk:Andrew Wright26

This is Andrew Wright26's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

The article should be written in WP:Prose, rather than as a list of "points". Discuss his early life, education, swimming career, and post-swimming life. Give specific details of his swimming achievements, "he was there" is basically meaningless.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Andrew Wright26/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:32, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Andrew Wright26, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:32, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Christopher Mark Pattinson has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Christopher Mark Pattinson. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Andrew Wright26 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not done anything wrong and cannot undertand why I have been blocked from editing an article about my friend Christopher Mark Pattinson Swimming career. In my opinion he deserves a Wikapedia page do to all his achivements in swimming I am not a Sock Puppet and you are wrong to assume that. I have also not damaged anyones page and never would. That statement is not true and it appears you had come to conclusions without any facts. Andrew Wright26 (talk) 20:18, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See below. —DoRD (talk) 21:36, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

These accounts are Technically indistinguishable:

Andrew Wright26 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Chris M Pattinson (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Mark Pattinson1 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Christopher Mark Pattinson (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

—DoRD (talk) 21:36, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So only one person can use one computer? The other accounts are my brothers and friends. So they have to use a different computer than me? The IP address is the computers not linked to the individual people who wrote any of the articles. I am not going to argue with as I don't see any point, but you are rushing to a false judgement. None of us have done anything wrong but use the same computers to write genuine articles. I could supply the ID of each person but I accept your decision and you keep the accounts blocked if it makes you happy Please however remove the Ip addressee and names from the Wikipedia talk page as this with respect this is a breach of data protection and a security risk that my computer and the other devices used to write the Wikipedia pages could be hacked. I would appreciate this and I will not write anymore articles or will any of my friends and family be writing anymore articles you will be pleased to hear. We are all not sock puppets as you state and are just normal genuine people. Mr Chris Pattinson is notable in many subjects and deserves a Wikipedia page for all his achievements in swimming alone and all the charity work he has done and its sad you cannot see that. He represented his country many times and numerous counties and clubs and held a number of UK swimming records for the Butterfly stroke and all the citations have been supplied... . Andrew Wright26 (talk) 21:54, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Andrew Wright26 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here Andrew Wright26 (talk) 22:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So your "brothers and friends" include "CMP Productions USA" which happens to be the company Christopher Mark Pattinson is the CEO of? Yeah, sure. See WP:MEAT. Huon (talk) 22:48, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I want to add some text to the article please. Thank you----

Yes Chris M Pattinson is the CEO of CMP Productions UK and USA and yes his brothers have used the same devices and as a friend of his so have I and Chris M Pattinson brother has used the same devices. We are in London and as stated we could supply ID if required for all the users but not interested in defending our position. You use the word Sure but with respect I don't know anything about you so I never make any comment negative or positive as I don't know you. I don't expect you to publish the article in a million years so your welcome to keep the block in place indefinitely. I am not sure what the crime is but we have no interest in writing any further articles. You continue to sadly to jump to the wrong conclusions. All the best I will not be making any further comment and hope you keep your theory's to yourself as I for one are not interested in hearing them. Please don't take anything I said personal as it's not intended to be. Your just wrong with your theory of which Mr Pattinson has already informed the CEO of Wikapedia via twitter. I would like to add if Wikipedia want to continue to receive donations then they need to have a more trusting open mind in my opinion. I don't think any contributor expects every article to be published but to just block people after they have spent there own time writing an article is morally wrong.Andrew Wright26 (talk) 10:48, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let me spell it out for you since you apparently did not read the policy I linked to. There are several obviously related accounts - including yours - whose sole purpose is to write about Pattinson, a person who hasn't been shown to meet Wikipedia's standards of notability, violating copyright in the process. Now you claim that User:Chris M Pattinson, User:Mark Pattinson1 and User:Christopher Mark Pattinson are your "brothers and friends". Or maybe they are Pattinson's brothers too. That doesn't really matter; we don't care if that's a single person with multiple accounts or multiple people who impersonate Pattinson (which would itself be grounds for a block for some of these accounts): "Closely connected users may be considered a single user for Wikipedia's purposes if they edit with the same objectives." That definitely holds here. Huon (talk) 23:24, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christopher Mark Pattinson (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Huon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There were some newspaper clippings showing that he swam on a school team. Everything else is unreferenced or based on non-independent or unreliable sources. That's not enough.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christopher Mark Pattinson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Huon (talk) 23:10, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Andrew Wright26 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17094 was submitted on Dec 11, 2016 09:36:53. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 09:36, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Andrew Wright26 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock)

Request reason:

I will be the only person who uses the computer I will not try and upload anything else onto Wikipedia I will listen to the advice of other editors and reevaluate whether or not the subject I wish to write about is notable - and accept any decision made by another editor I will not use my user page or any page other than the Article Creation Wizard to submit/add content about my chosen subject Andrew Wright26 (talk) 15:04, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Appeal withdrawn by user - "I am still blocked but please don't worry about the block it can stay in place indefinitely ..." Just Chilling (talk) 01:43, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

I've formatted your request properly for you. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:32, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank youAndrew Wright26 (talk) 00:25, 16 December 2016 (UTC) I am still blocked but please don't worry about the block it can stay in place indefinitely, however I was never going to do any of the things I was accused offAndrew Wright26 (talk) 00:32, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote this page about my friend Chris Pattinson on his computer he has been told his page will never be published by an exceutive at Wikapedia who cannot be questioned so please don't waste any time on editting it even though it was appreciated I wish you all the best.Andrew Wright26 (talk) 22:40, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]