Jump to content

User talk:Defaultmode42

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Andreashorn)

Welcome!

[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia and Wikiproject Medicine

Hello, Andreashorn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, try Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then type {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page.

If you are interested in medicine-related themes, you may want to visit the Medicine Portal.
If you are interested in improving medicine-related articles, you may want to join WikiProject Medicine (sign up here or say hello here).


Again, welcome! WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:52, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andres M Lozano (July 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Relativity was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Relativity ⚡️ 09:46, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Defaultmode42! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Relativity ⚡️ 09:46, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andres M Lozano (July 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by 48JCL were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
48JCL 14:56, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear 48JCL,
thank you so much for reviewing this one – and I am admittedly new here. I am a researcher in the DBS field and can say with confidence that Dr. Lozano is among the top five most famous people in this field, most cited neurosurgeon world-wide, etc. In your assessment, please also see Wikipedia:Notability (academics) – in which he would check many of the boxes. To name one example, the Olivecrona award is the highest honor given to neurosurgeons, world-wide.
I also did include many references that cover his work prominently (e.g. the article in the independent). But as an academic, the weight on news-stories is not as high as e.g. awards, achievements, contributions to the field, etc.
To help me better understand things: Would you be able to give some examples of sources that would convince you more that Dr. Lozano is a highly notable neuroscientist? Would news-stories about him be better or citation records? Would scientific articles help? For his case, everything is available (he even inspired a Dr. House episode). Since I'm new, I just don't know what you would find most convincing.
Thank you so much for further help on this!
Andy Defaultmode42 (talk) 15:36, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andres M Lozano has been accepted

[edit]
Andres M Lozano, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ldm1954 (talk) 13:18, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Learned a lot in the process! Defaultmode42 (talk) 17:43, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Defaultmode42. Thank you for your work on Hagai Bergman. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this helpful biography. It would be helpful to integrate this better into Wikipedia by linking it from other pages; some of the biographical details also need referencing.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 05:09, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]