Jump to content

User talk:Andrés Santiago Pérez-Bergquist

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia, the greatest encyclopedia on Earth! You seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! You may wish to review the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, as well as the avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages. The Wikipedia directory is also quite useful. In addition, you might want to add yourself to the new user log; if you made any edits before getting an account, you may wish to assign those to your username.

By the way, an important tip: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments.

Finally, here are some open tasks:


You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Fix spelling and grammar
None

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.

Hope to see you around the Wiki! And if you have any questions whatsoever, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Welcome to the 'pedia and thanks for creating the Grabowski article. As you can see I have expanded it! Kit 17:32, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Also good work on your edits to Rebecca Borgstrom. Kit 17:33, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

US and UK English spelling both equally valid

[edit]

Just a note - "centred" isn't technically a typo, it's English spelling (as opposed to US English), and so is generally viewed as equally correct in Wikipedia. In practice, if the subject is US related (e.g. Mount Tehama then it probably should be spelt "centered", but if you see it spelt "centred" on an British article, don't change it. Average Earthman 09:02, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article Geoffrey C. Grabowski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence or claim of personal notability. other then he worked on some games.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tracer9999 (talk) 18:09, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Geoffrey C. Grabowski for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Geoffrey C. Grabowski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geoffrey C. Grabowski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tracer9999 (talk) 18:14, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]