User talk:AndersFeder

NASA and the Quest for the Lost Tapes

Seen on http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Reports_of_Streptococcus_mitis_on_the_moon :
"NASA is funding an archival study in 2007 that will try to locate the film of the camera-body microbial sampling to confirm the report of a breach in sterile technique." This is bad. The National Aeronautics and Space Agency, ya'know, the guys who put man on the Moon, has to put an entry on their budget for a mission into their archives in order to recover scientific material from it. Wonder if they are going for a robotic rover or a manned mission... Oh, the bureaucracy! Learn how to index people! --AndersFeder (talk) 18:03, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Although I can see you've been on wikipedia for several years, it doesn't seem like anyone has given you the usual welcome. So here it is.

Welcome!

Hello, AndersFeder, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Kingdon (talk) 11:14, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LHC

Hey, just so you know I partially reverted your LHC edit, you got it right the first time it was plural beams ;) as they went clockwise and anti-clockwise. cheers ^Khukri 12:35, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Beam 1 came online first. Only a day or so later did Beam 2 come online. --AndersFeder (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, clockwise beam started just before 7pm and established with full capture and turns by about 8:40pm, then there was a short pause and the anti-clockwise beam injection started and was captured by just before midnight. ^Khukri 13:47, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Swell :) --AndersFeder (talk) 14:02, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

s'what I thought ;) You can follow the progress here. Regards ^Khukri 14:06, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Red Panda Firefox

You just added a citation request to the Red Panda article. I am assuming that since I reference a pile of dictionaries after the sentence you added the tag to, that you are asking for a citation of "One often repeated "fact" on the Web," and not the translation itself. I'm not quite sure how to approach this. I found about 10 references in the first two pages when I googled "firefox chinese red panda", and most of these are zoos and other sites that purport to be experts on the subject. I can of course just put a string of references, but that's kind of clumsy and it begs the question of "how many makes "often". I'm relatively new to Wikipedia, so any suggestions on how to handle this wouild be appreciated. the point I am trying to make is that it is a relatively widespread misconception, at least among Red Panda groups and fans, and wherever the name comes from it does not seem to be from Chinese.Donlammers (talk) 23:55, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. First off, don't worry too much about it - what you did is a very common transgression. I merely tagged it to let other editors know that they might want to reformulate the sentence if they can. The problem with the sentence is that it constitutes original research, which generally doesn't have a place on Wikipedia. Instead, the proper procedure is to find a reputable source (a newspaper, an academic paper etc.) that can back up your specific claim and then attribute the claim to that source when writing the article. This can seem pedantic when a simple Google search reveals that your claim is true, but nonetheless, this is what is required per the WP:V policy.--AndersFeder (talk) 16:03, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:AnotherWorld Cover 960.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:AnotherWorld Cover 960.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 19:38, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProjects Moon and Mars activity

Hello there! As part of an effort to determine how many active editors are present in the space-related WikiProjects, some changes have been made to the lists of members of WikiProject Moon (here) and Mars (here). If you still consider yourself to be an active editor either of these projects, it would be appreciated if you would please edit the list so that your name is not struck out - thus a clearer idea of the number of active editors can be determined. Many thanks in advance!

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Solar System at 17:49, 3 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mars Exploration Program Analysis Group

The article Mars Exploration Program Analysis Group has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Oo7565 (talk) 22:46, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AndersFeder. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AndersFeder. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]