User talk:AndTheCrowdGoesWild

Welcome!

Hello, AndTheCrowdGoesWild, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! DS 14:27, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Teamgeist World Cup Ball 06 Large.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Teamgeist World Cup Ball 06 Large.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:07, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization

I reverted these edits [1] [2] because they appear to be non-sensical or perhaps corrupted by some sort of automated tool. Please be careful when editing Wikipedia articles in the future.

Thanks! -- Beland 20:22, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Rhino.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rhino.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

unblock|It was not me that vandalised Wikipedia, it is because the computer I use shares an ISP with other computers in this building so please unblokc this IP Addres - 194.83.172.81

Your IP has been unblocked. pschemp | talk 13:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Smith (gladiator)

Hi, I've removed some of the content from the Mark Smith (gladiator) page, as it copied from http://www.rhino.me.uk/gladiators.htm. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- PhiJ 18:40, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Links

Hi. I have unlinked the external links on your user page. We're pretty free and easy about user pages, but Wikipedia is not a link farm and now it's bigger than bit it is being abused for SEO spamming and other nefarious purposes, so the links policy is getting tighter. Just zis Guy you know? 15:54, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rebel!

Come, my friend! We will drive out these internet gangsters from our home! Then when we are done, we will drink whiskey by the gallon, and make merry. This calls for a rousing rendition of Beasts of England!

Your Comrade, Tall Boy

Bahhh

I kept fucking it up, dont know how. See stramash for an example of my fine article-writing.

Alto Ragazzo Medico Pepe 20:06, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny Vaughan

I did not understand this edit, which you called vandalism in the edit summary, and reverted it. If there was a good reason for the edit please let me know. Rettetast 22:27, 1 December 2006 (UT

Reference

In addition to your lack of knowledge of basketball, I feel you must stop these weak attempts at vandalism.

Shut your mouth fool, you racist kracker, I pop a cap in your ass.

Unblock request

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

User asked nicely.

Request handled by: Yamla 21:30, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that you are responsible for any edits made from your account. If your friends use your account again to vandalise the Wikipedia, you may not be unblocked. --Yamla 21:30, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 86.13.132.8 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: Yamla 23:01, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could an administrator please unblock my IP address, I was directly blocked and then Yamla unblocked me, however, now the administrator who originally blocked me has autoblocked me even though I have made no edits whatsoever during the short period of time when I was unblocked. Thankyou, AndTheCrowdGoesWild 22:42, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done, sorry for not catching this earlier. Autoblocks are automatic, the original blocking admin had nothing extra against you, I just forgot to check for autoblocks. Have a happy day. --Yamla 23:01, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Derren Brown

It is generally considered incorrect to put days, such as Friday, in articles on wikipedia. Please avoid this in future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olz06 (talk • contribs)

Jacqui Oatley

Hi, I've nominated an article you worked on, Jacqui Oatley, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the "hook" for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created on April 19 where you can improve it if you see fit. Regards, howcheng {chat} 16:51, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 April, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jacqui Oatley, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 01:50, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Glasgow2014.jpg

Hello, AndTheCrowdGoesWild. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Glasgow2014.jpg) was found at the following location: User:AndTheCrowdGoesWild/Userboxes/Glasgow 2014. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:39, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Image:Aston Villa Logo.gif

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Aston Villa Logo.gif, by Strangerer (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Aston Villa Logo.gif is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Aston Villa Logo.gif, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:43, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Kevin Dunn (WWE)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Kevin Dunn (WWE), by 70.230.234.173 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Kevin Dunn (WWE) is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Kevin Dunn (WWE), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 15:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:The New Paul O'Grady Show.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:The New Paul O'Grady Show.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:36, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ToyWatch logo.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:ToyWatch logo.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:31, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:JOOP! logo.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:JOOP! logo.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:16, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WrestleMania XXIV

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Thank you. TJ Spyke 23:49, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How can something be announced on the March 18th edition of SD when today is only March 7th?. TJ Spyke 00:29, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, your source only says that she will be at WrestleMania. TJ Spyke 00:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at WP:V. Unsourced info does not belong in articles. We are even more strict with wrestling articles since some people seem to have something against wrestling and try to undermine us (like one editor who went around blanking bio articles and had an admin wrapped around his finger and supporting him). I'm not convinced it's all that notable either. She's not really gonna host the PPV, she might just appear onscreen (like every other celeb at WM). TJ Spyke 00:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Celtic F.C. Seasons

A tag has been placed on Template:Celtic F.C. Seasons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:30, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Nbtah

I have nominated Nbtah, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nbtah. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Doug Weller (talk) 10:15, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:When Will I Be Famous.PNG)

Thanks for uploading File:When Will I Be Famous.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:When Will I Be Famous.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:When Will I Be Famous.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peter Lawwell for deletion

The article Peter Lawwell is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Lawwell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Echetus Xe 18:07, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ToyWatch logo.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ToyWatch logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:23, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rim Jim

The article Rim Jim has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to find any sources confirming existence.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 22:09, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nathan Lawrence for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nathan Lawrence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Lawrence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CallyMc (talk) 08:10, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]